From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE01FC47422 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id CB877C43390; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B57C433C7; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:41:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org B8B57C433C7 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1706528505; bh=EN7taMbsZ4JvwQRhusiP6ICCLdzXLJsw+sqYbACBuDI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Qg+07uLjBw2ybBNZrJWOLESfJSu/Z2qKHYYqb3Xu7iLw+R+//eSR8MoZf/F6WOLHP BQJ87G9T3U1ZDy5TNNAUBI3bo6/QjIc4lqpyjKBGjXWfkiy6ih8DjydbNJOamY9dGI 4lITctITMYoVcNdoAVMfDC6X2C6DmOfuORJUZ9E3IxydCL0lYWrAA0K9gogkMab2e6 NcvCPUwrXHT0NdiQ4ds0UtOaF7qqYlryb/fd0G+sUgmS4uf9mpZYbgO3N4hdbeeyYt Zp/fGJOiWMSqBfBefZK4/oRLKiE+hTtcNc8oQwaHywywK+uNJ1g7ic7FjC/B00UcIF W9xnB1OgTqZ5g== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4A5F3780029; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <841e102c-c5ab-432c-bdba-efdd67a3c129@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:41:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Support for airoha en7581 Soc Content-Language: en-US To: Conor Dooley List-Id: Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Felix Fietkau , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, John Crispin , soc@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , dd@embedd.com References: <20240129-gawk-strongly-91344f34d004@spud> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20240129-gawk-strongly-91344f34d004@spud> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 29/01/24 12:39, Conor Dooley ha scritto: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:34:37PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 29/01/24 12:20, Lorenzo Bianconi ha scritto: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> I was wondering about the status of the following patches: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231001122418.2688120-4-dd@embedd.com/T/#rbafabf4bf2473327f35ce7d79623f63838630537 >>> >>> Do we need to respin them? Thx in advance. >>> >> >> Lorenzo, I don't think you have to. > > The compatibles in en7581-evb.dts appear to be undocumented as of > whatever linux-next I have checked out from late last week. > Right, there's a 7523, but not a 7581. Needs one more commit :-) >> >> Matthias, should we update the MAINTAINERS file to include the MediaTek >> Airoha folder? >> >> Actually that question is for both ARM and ARM64. >> >> Cheers