From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF93C433EF for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id DD9B7C340EC; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com (mail-wm1-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FAD7C340EB for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:22:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org 3FAD7C340EB Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id az26-20020a05600c601a00b0037c078db59cso981274wmb.4 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 01:22:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=MGallghbqZYnV5XKa1+ZW10tPrTrZGW9EkboS7fw5MQ=; b=wVvz2W3ESnbTzOVGKu+YOG9h+YDJ+KwFyhJTmJJzyRY5M+7hZeO8mDzNq02IwUr/w/ DQ9Ebxsy4tukzG+Cv6VjxPGiR+YHA6KhNobCh/HL8IqlVnIy+cRSv/SolinaKdGTiEH7 El8dS3NWdA5UVReFFH5aG1HRZ0CSbs9d1xECsLMcNdFIs5Mub3MSiNm/3F3Np9aWpXuS u766soTHmG4JViYSnWGynU7neqFnv7ynOCe6FTvE2+YeZOmgw+t5HeBA0zCPuLc3Po6l WWU1j+6BMCRYVmqMsTBzAvFQujRevjh5OkxuFxTUE9YGTKPpT+0/im0ba/1mUUF0UcjD BKhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=MGallghbqZYnV5XKa1+ZW10tPrTrZGW9EkboS7fw5MQ=; b=KHTSwBFzPQIRsQ7QmJbAzsOhWAqvUxGVsJsQbRIb9YxNbUj8lxtjUoygC0LrmmUONh xvJQRS6uqzta2b6nj0Z2bZVMyN6dgwNY6nAqYiSit2FCnVgoaUvEifd0BRqDrWn/Gx5J XPI7pgoIhHMBo0cVn/FBETPBl6UeVDzzpPWOxlFtTtXy6RXua4ljMd/0Xy8207TJZ4EG 310mRXbMXKJcphbAByR3+UpBCF0Mxv2yxEbh3aWRnjwIaI4CDSmtuLPsghN8HXxPN065 gOF+2A/UY0bEEzbPuCutTLvtKttllKaF1iU7xFFhDWeUesGeAPih/BDNEpkJWazHRFzK bO2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533etpHUbavLrmeyWsXl9GAviYMXtsxB6TX+e41v7jDDggWXTHZ6 ssbb+Cr1R60zYiPJBNaWbPorkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzELvsNi/azn1IFMoIkFlgJQS6KAnNJYi5Q+IUJAj5r3qfJnM0VYiWzldu9oTmC+b3qdCyTGg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e8e:b0:37b:b9ab:e35d with SMTP id be14-20020a05600c1e8e00b0037bb9abe35dmr2228754wmb.109.1644916972521; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 01:22:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (cpc155339-bagu17-2-0-cust87.1-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.27.177.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f14sm13569965wmq.3.2022.02.15.01.22.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 01:22:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:22:50 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Cc: Michael Walle , SoC Team , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself as a maintainer for the sl28cpld Message-ID: References: <20220207184652.1218447-1-michael@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 5:36 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:16 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > Hold on, you're not going to get many Acks if you don't send it to the > > > > other subsystem maintainers. :) > > > > > > I've already applied this one through the soc tree. > > > > You did? I missed the acceptance email. > > I see now that the automated mails only get sent the submitter and > the list that is owned by patchwork. I completely missed how this > was sent to multiple maintainers and just grabbed it from patchwork > along with some other maintainer changes I picked up. > > > It would have been nice to give the other maintainers a chance to look > > at it first, but I guess it's not a big deal in the great scheme. > > Right, I need to find a better process to look at the actual emails > when going through patchwork. Sorry about that. No problem at all. Thank you for the explanation. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog