From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B01FCDB47E for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id DB4FAC433CD; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com (mail-pl1-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A2BC433C8 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:41:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org C2A2BC433C8 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c9c145bb5bso178665ad.1 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1697128865; x=1697733665; darn=kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cSKjALH7K6gqrT2RIcyszQs/ymuQ9k0jAbQvHQpJcQA=; b=08GfQgnNaimEQ50VOyFRD0flYr5dOnIpqgBiyblMKlsJiyyDTwU5ZAUcSDDDC8fNX/ NVJdJ2X2oZzHkeQW0hAJXaLJiDb39khD8utzJ+c274YU5qiQSsr5SReIWu1XKsXHx25t ZHIpBTqD7NXCGg/GNnn8gAiUg4G05st9f//c83LWajfsZAvdPeTF0sXlmOO7NO6jbFoe M8PSH3JRNKLLM0FXAl57KmZo5mu/3XKfi3jipldzNXES+i7+/vi7j+spbsZceyOb1o/7 17FrCRYqIAW34PxifGPkTN3InTh0VmgoCvDDQnhkhoeGtBhbMSsN91Ssb/gDBXtl7VZp PM2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697128865; x=1697733665; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cSKjALH7K6gqrT2RIcyszQs/ymuQ9k0jAbQvHQpJcQA=; b=t5mpQhEqhxr0xmzBuO04zEpd2XWwqQm2SJKgZkH8DrfGmGjm4/rwDzv5Fwv0mqjek+ IjaxocsyoRSv7SQY7bGdGzmPT7nqQvniy9fqrRjuG6AeSuEy6qf34RlwTvEqkXTBL9yY LrEimjL0lNEZHe/jGUdojDJVX8uYlJVS1EqqIUQKu+26michlMEcjfyHI7E4ZCfvIKPa Vqs6sF3Gx/XqDYn+LLMceHIN8wC3d+MR3ZmA+6PlqF4LtZg2gY482uwhmFnvrijR8Auz cRDTS9VbCHAQAoGm11S8RqG7WvOVVXIU9dYen7Ci767EJVbsitn09D7zAwHp8gQxvfWY cwQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzx/zW2EsSWryA39CZvwNfjhOGu+nM3rfNK2dGkIgXmKpZrw9z7 F5ZJ6XxC4NsigdsJu507pP+NCw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGbop51QjWpgXb5pkCyl9/yUmkBYSbumMYF7aG+hEKDNgoq4+8TkErlkAcvF9Oq1e+uxKOYXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f54e:b0:1c1:e54a:3971 with SMTP id h14-20020a170902f54e00b001c1e54a3971mr478238plf.1.1697128864785; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (137.22.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.22.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9-20020a17090a190900b002792b7182dcsm2224617pjg.49.2023.10.12.09.41.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:41:01 -0700 From: William McVicker To: Krzysztof Kozlowski List-Id: Cc: Peter Griffin , robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com, tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, saravanak@google.com, soc@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/20] dt-bindings: clock: Add Google gs101 clock management unit bindings Message-ID: References: <20231011184823.443959-1-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <20231011184823.443959-3-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <21742fbf-8484-42ab-aba1-379305091946@linaro.org> <67ce052e-ac78-492f-9a36-6947ce161951@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67ce052e-ac78-492f-9a36-6947ce161951@linaro.org> Hi Krzysztof, On 10/12/2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/10/2023 12:45, Peter Griffin wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > >> > >> On 12/10/2023 10:56, Peter Griffin wrote: > >>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>> > >>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 07:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 11/10/2023 23:48, William McVicker wrote: > >>>>> On 10/11/2023, Peter Griffin wrote: > >>>>>> Provide dt-schema documentation for Google gs101 SoC clock controller. > >>>>>> Currently this adds support for cmu_top, cmu_misc and cmu_apm. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin > >>>>> > >>>>> Tested-by: Will McVicker > >>>> > >>>> And how do you perform testing of a binding? > >>> > >>> I guess if William is using my script to build and flash the kernel it actually > >>> runs the DTC checks as part of the build process. > >>> > >>> See https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/googlelt/pixelscripts/-/blob/clo/main/buildp21upstream.sh#L44 > >> > >> So it is a build test? We do not consider building as a test procedure, > >> otherwise I should add my and robots tested-by to many other patches. > > > > Ok so I should only add the Tested-by on the .c patches? > > In my opinion, if someone performs only build testing, it is not a > testing. You cannot test the bindings other way than build testing, at > least I do not know such way. Of course other code like C or DTS affects > hardware so it can be tested. What additional testing beside building and booting do you prefer at this stage? I put my Tested-by for this patch because it includes the google,gs101.h header which is used by the DT and clock controller driver during boot. Maybe I should have been more clear on what I tested in each patch instead of only mentioning how I tested in the cover letter? Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Will > > > > >> Shall I consider other Tested-by tags here also as build-tested only? > > > > No. William indicated here > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZScZu-QB2LmB4CSM@google.com/T/#mbd96a26b725d6c85eb4193de8cd70ff277bc728e > > that he booted it on his Oriole device. > > > OK, I was just a bit confused. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >