From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7F4C04FFE for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 11:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id BF91BC4AF63; Wed, 8 May 2024 11:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB78C113CC; Wed, 8 May 2024 11:17:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org AEB78C113CC Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xDaRI53fTKO9ncUk5DLsgQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 85Mhmp+6QUOj8vwPweUNog== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11066"; a="28535467" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="28535467" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 04:17:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FYQYL4JjTrmMh8A84hJPDA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tFsKdhskQxen+Pk2x3TCSQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="28949322" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 04:17:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s4fIa-00000005PLq-33pb; Wed, 08 May 2024 14:17:24 +0300 Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 14:17:24 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= List-Id: Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , Arnd Bergmann , soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Bartosz Golaszewski , Christophe JAILLET , Dan Carpenter , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guenter Roeck , Herbert Xu , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Olivia Mackall , Rob Herring , Wim Van Sebroeck , Andrew Lunn , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Turris Omnia MCU driver Message-ID: References: <20240508103118.23345-1-kabel@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240508103118.23345-1-kabel@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 12:31:09PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote: > Hello Andy, Hans, Ilpo, Arnd, Gregory, and others, > > this is v9 of the series adding Turris Omnia MCU driver. > > This series still depends on the immutable branch between LEDs and > locking, introducing devm_mutex_init(), see the PR > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20240412084616.GR2399047@google.com/ > > See also cover letters for v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7 and v8: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20230823161012.6986-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20230919103815.16818-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20231023143130.11602-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20231026161803.16750-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20240323164359.21642-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20240418121116.22184-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20240424173809.7214-1-kabel@kernel.org/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/cover/20240430115111.3453-1-kabel@kernel.org/ >From GPIO implementation perspective, it's good enough in my opinion. The rest can be amended later on. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko