From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6A3375F99 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774944795; cv=none; b=NTC0ac0GK9AqatOz5+c/Hlgeg2ZFrtu5w7JxsgKlpx3IyZ71mO5C+ofsejKNS1p9TcpfYsRAgvFv/lzI/aKa6N9Sv3HKy2t+4b1GA8AND5DKuwZv7qx2I/fKjTcz5CTN81JW09I2u2NEE7I/Jz0K5QKPLHXQaT4DW0DMrNPrj88= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774944795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pJGLGPlP+pgDoOnMJ+vDANz34nLVCZQqTJjj+JlmLOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=otCB5hDHegF5RuhbM5gHWmuBfyw3U0h4MnhG4HdoVGjyzn9zj8je1Gk6WSXR29sv+Vjd+unSKdkYDUBurfwkchRz+OINObnHbhxS9tWvT0HRnH5mIbzTGeNzBRx6nOgaqjVG6GzpjtQSMenJ5v4dy4htwsK1lsdEA6gUQwnVD2o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QKJ1TjY1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QKJ1TjY1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 2A277C2BCB0; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 877CDC19423; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774944795; bh=pJGLGPlP+pgDoOnMJ+vDANz34nLVCZQqTJjj+JlmLOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QKJ1TjY1KR5V2fPPOJ8XQi6etBUEiUGhvNaSWz4sQ4vb4o3f7qz6MkCmmuleaP4p3 YwUeNMwpx0sd9qjM5cAnmH1wd1zJGdvHG2DTbGscmWNHk0c5hYJgKd9mi7EU9l86m9 4dmS4MF6ZeoOiYzBriJJ6lU6kZErxPqRThfAin3Vz/hlq7sWyqnZqgqN4jXNYguAen 036nr0blsQWpXDIQTLqbWwM4h7zkS0QyQS7Bl9waqZIQSAZb64NWH7Sw3LQghV3jxp ncbGmmivlJ8q+AR3RvfSpimH9YvOXzDg7pXAUA1YgTq/R/Lc35pfbL5pIkEcI2KMIA LzhHooHZ/9e/A== Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:13:12 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org, Thierry Reding , Jon Hunter , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 6/7] arm64: tegra: Device tree changes for v7.1-rc1 Message-ID: References: <20260329151045.1443133-1-thierry.reding@kernel.org> <20260329151045.1443133-6-thierry.reding@kernel.org> <63b6c9da-4c0e-497c-a2a6-8aa5e74e2adb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: soc@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ucvm2dz66opruy4z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63b6c9da-4c0e-497c-a2a6-8aa5e74e2adb@kernel.org> --ucvm2dz66opruy4z Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 6/7] arm64: tegra: Device tree changes for v7.1-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 09:59:07AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 29/03/2026 17:10, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding > >=20 > > Hi ARM SoC maintainers, > >=20 > > The following changes since commit 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5= f27f: > >=20 > > Linux 7.0-rc1 (2026-02-22 13:18:59 -0800) > >=20 >=20 > I guess related to my question why patches were applied one day after > the list: >=20 > Days in linux-next: > ---------------------------------------- > 0 | ++++++++ (8) >=20 > Commits with 0 days in linux-next (8 of 8: 100.0%): > ... >=20 > So you exposed soc tree to all sort of integration issues. No, please > keep them for some days in the next before you send them to soc, to > allow people to test and eventually complain/report issues. Most issues would've been caught by daily bots already. A lot of these probably were in linux-next but changed SHAs because I rebased them on top of the PCI bindings patch to keep the shared branch as small as possible. I also do fairly extensive build testing on my side before sending those pull requests, so I don't think I've exposed the SoC tree to an unfair amount of integration issues. Thierry --ucvm2dz66opruy4z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEiOrDCAFJzPfAjcif3SOs138+s6EFAmnLghQACgkQ3SOs138+ s6FfYw/+LNdbCG4yiEIT7ANseqTzRj7TYxgDAAw6I+FYeoOC4PhIliXs7xdMQMC3 b7+LFqbsBcdIjG7TOLKcTeBjYtqOnGgHdWsAq3ZzA/RfZ8CmpjBhdQRC17xj0obs +WVpMTGcx51B7Am92oJeC8bG20c8q/Pw7E+xdwgO8tGiHY644TH6eWtijj14x94O JO4TVE8vwtvps8oQnTT49lfL9avljxGGd2M+LXbp1axt923uGfD6gI6NUovrxDXM Ihp1wln0YW3eF/wvmoxG+487P0GduvA9jrZf4ZGEcQ4bcQv7VebUk9JgVXVHVZII uxx2BeOdQUaZTcrCBV5/5iUNWORV+hCSblHZCuK+o0+HZ9MXxQi26+C4D7ZJ2RIV 82TWX9EyZXbTl/oRQmOUGPPpuziIL+M0nx8ToRGo5s9wzXmbj5xsC87gtQP+RYZ8 YL7dr1NkUtX+oqTzuhEVpiuR0NDFE0ggE68SL0ItlRiFxi3xATE3ttzvdTWXXawg 7zco6kR+kgnwUURK2i0JD8ZyLx9zqMkux7nQ/NnX07bQdRmJ+rZ75mHzR3C/SPrw YM0a9EZXicfqrTlidqAYo77d/XVqiVc0zU3rUwXbopN+SS+nYIedyGsdsZNl558G gHY8TBhuDSYVdB/dYdu7lpzms/Fcl1W23sOjlUPpaXkaFuPlPjU= =nwD7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ucvm2dz66opruy4z--