From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: carsten.haitzler@arm.com, soc@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:34:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd43b159-0510-dc78-8ec0-7a52fc3d404a@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220510120756.gcosdydmccbytmrn@bogus>
On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
>>
>>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
>>
>> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
>> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
>
> Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
> I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
>
Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new
Morello board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and
presto... it "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad
"cost" so defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing
up this patch as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or
denied... :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 12:55 [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays carsten.haitzler
2022-05-10 11:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-10 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-10 11:56 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-10 12:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-10 12:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-10 12:34 ` Carsten Haitzler [this message]
2022-05-10 14:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-10 14:53 ` Carsten Haitzler
2022-05-10 12:55 ` Liviu Dudau
2022-05-10 13:05 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-10 14:05 ` Carsten Haitzler
2022-05-10 16:19 ` Liviu Dudau
2022-05-10 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-10 20:06 ` Liviu Dudau
2022-05-11 13:13 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-11 13:15 ` Carsten Haitzler
2022-05-11 11:00 ` Carsten Haitzler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-27 11:42 carsten.haitzler
2022-05-09 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-10 12:42 ` Carsten Haitzler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd43b159-0510-dc78-8ec0-7a52fc3d404a@foss.arm.com \
--to=carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=carsten.haitzler@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox