From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:52:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 RFC 0/3] Generic IOMMU pooled allocator Message-Id: <1428007964.20500.270.camel@kernel.crashing.org> List-Id: References: <551B4502.1020603@oracle.com> <20150331.231224.402909066860518278.davem@davemloft.net> <20150402125152.GA17528@oracle.com> <20150402.122133.402067811944670903.davem@davemloft.net> <1428006142.20500.246.camel@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <1428006142.20500.246.camel@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: aik@au1.ibm.com, sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com, anton@au1.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 07:22 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 12:21 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > From: Sowmini Varadhan > > Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:51:52 -0400 > > > > > do I need to resubmit this without the RFC tag? Perhaps I should > > > have dropped that some time ago. > > > > I want to hear from the powerpc folks whether they can positively > > adopt the new generic code or not. > > Oh yes, I'm fine with it, it's basically our code slightly refactored, > but I still have a few minor review comments on Swomini's patch I > started to put together yesterday but didn't finish. I'll send them > today. Actually I found some more serious issues that for some reason I didn't spot the other day. Will send comments in a jiffy. Ben.