Re: [PATCH 7/8] s390: mv s390 sysctls into their own file under arch/s390 dir

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:56:23AM +0100, joel granados wrote:
> Move s390 sysctls (spin_retry and userprocess_debug) into their own
> files under arch/s390. We create two new sysctl tables
> (2390_{fault,spin}_sysctl_table) which will be initialized with
> arch_initcall placing them after their original place in proc_root_init.
> 
> This is part of a greater effort to move ctl tables into their
> respective subsystems which will reduce the merge conflicts in
> kerenel/sysctl.c.
  ^^^^^^^
typo

> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> index a81a01c44927..4483fdc9d472 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
>  #include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/asm.h>
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +#include <linux/sysctl.h>
> +#endif
> +
...
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +static const struct ctl_table s390_spin_sysctl_table[] = {
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "spin_retry",
> +		.data		= &spin_retry,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init init_s390_spin_sysctls(void)
> +{
> +	register_sysctl_init("kernel", s390_spin_sysctl_table);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(init_s390_spin_sysctls);
> +#endif

I see that you want to keep the existing CONFIG_SMP behaviour, but since a
long time s390 enforces CONFIG_SMP=y (this was obviously never reflected in
kernel/sysctl.c).
Therefore the above ifdefs should be removed, and in addition the include
statement should be added to the other linux includes at the top of the file.