From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 18:57:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507091856.C6510D809A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jz662ssp.fsf@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 04:13:02PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless
> > the __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for
> > __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to
> > handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved. For
> > s390 this requires forcing a couple functions to be inline with
> > __always_inline.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> > Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> > Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c | 2 +-
> > arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> > index 5158aefe4873..93f1e1eb5ea6 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(linear_map_kf_hash_lock);
> >
> > static phys_addr_t kfence_pool;
> >
> > -static inline void hash_kfence_alloc_pool(void)
> > +static __always_inline void hash_kfence_alloc_pool(void)
> > {
> > if (!kfence_early_init_enabled())
> > goto err;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> > index 9f764bc42b8c..3238e9ed46b5 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> > @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int __meminit create_physical_mapping(unsigned long start,
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KFENCE
> > -static inline phys_addr_t alloc_kfence_pool(void)
> > +static __always_inline phys_addr_t alloc_kfence_pool(void)
> > {
> > phys_addr_t kfence_pool;
> >
>
> I remember seeing a warning msg around .init.text section. Let me dig
> that...
>
> ... Here it is: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504190552.mnFGs5sj-lkp@intel.com/
>
> I am not sure why it only complains for hash_debug_pagealloc_alloc_slots().
> I believe there should me more functions to mark with __init here.
> Anyways, here is the patch of what I had in mind.. I am not a compiler expert,
> so please let me know your thoughts on this.
Yeah, this looks good. I'll snag your patch and drop mine. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 4:39 [PATCH v2 00/14] stackleak: Support Clang stack depth tracking Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] stackleak: Rename STACKLEAK to KSTACK_ERASE Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] stackleak: Rename stackleak_track_stack to __sanitizer_cov_stack_depth Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] stackleak: Split KSTACK_ERASE_CFLAGS from GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] x86: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches Kees Cook
2025-05-23 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-23 20:28 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-25 21:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-27 3:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] arm: " Kees Cook
2025-05-23 11:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64: " Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] s390: " Kees Cook
2025-05-23 9:35 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: " Kees Cook
2025-05-23 5:24 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-23 15:15 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-24 10:43 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-07-10 1:57 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] mips: " Kees Cook
2025-06-19 8:55 ` Huacai Chen
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] loongarch: " Kees Cook
2025-06-19 8:55 ` Huacai Chen
2025-06-24 12:31 ` Huacai Chen
2025-06-25 1:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] init.h: Disable sanitizer coverage for __init and __head Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] kstack_erase: Support Clang stack depth tracking Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] configs/hardening: Enable CONFIG_KSTACK_ERASE Kees Cook
2025-05-23 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] configs/hardening: Enable CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202507091856.C6510D809A@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).