Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters

[Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> +cc CoC.
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
> > > things work.
> >
> > This accusation of yours is NOT:
> > - Using welcoming and inclusive language
> > - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> > - Showing empathy towards other community members
> >
> > This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.
>
> It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
> review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
> itnent.

There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must
be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true
from my perspective.

I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed,
but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree
to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please
don't mix that up.

> >
> > (I'm also still waiting for your reply to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
> > )
>
> Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack.

It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel
that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I
don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm
waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear
things up and resolve the misunderstanding.

It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.