From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com (mail-lj1-f173.google.com [209.85.208.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01F61C8603; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754410445; cv=none; b=sG45V+GdoMCFbtHP7VEmUL6bBUdZbUd8hiDEKg74MKdZBpnjaKs4yu4uwGYiR6Oki7jRfXlLmomHtb53k3HabVuLHE1n1g+c/f9M0z2AziGhIYzH45Q1x7ze7HXsQ/AQg/4CbepgcYz9E6DuE71W0sZqtyuzHlZTzFq8/phv8Dw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754410445; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BglbfbCfxjDdNAl+FJxNAK3U0aRdh/ewx/iXRTko+dM=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bCmNbeoNjxCiJOkQpA5AgctmWxrwYxOk64myWn6QfJKVFwLD9eZPsterRDrBgUAlXvak5oXqwn8pjfSS4/PZlT0jFZsr7WcS4ipaxi4Gn6RXxmjPGjbdu8tB+CBF96xZJ8joZ+Q+aRtuJWOa+31mDqWadGk6qdXVOy0PucI5B+o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Zu+U3pL5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Zu+U3pL5" Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-332631e47afso714441fa.0; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 09:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1754410442; x=1755015242; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ut5lsjSSswYnbLzk6rrdmu5+CeAKFhijQRi1rB1wfMg=; b=Zu+U3pL5o4ZPJwIdkXISpU2dyfPB0+TNZSjkYcKaYSD+SRRfTxkyiY1CToGY5wFqXg d8melksPoN+JtITTK/3buDk8xEYbfYAarJDpRVujvYiOcWyWF7oQh2Bih2TJHc50/B2G 9ZSAO+oT9l+ky/3GyCE1N/l6yabchtlYwVZ+jVHSjdVj6iebKyEv27RnIb7aN9pPx0JD m4TSkoDO2Yc6tLTV92FnvVCzzvf4ITl6fFll+GlPKPIj/SaRddi5H5EkcddCdZcWoTAi RwT2OhbFiB8+sd9j9pLdRESRxpfojA4PvSkmWNZIRK9A5+KcBdYgxbVvRXdnnlCEuZB6 7ptw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754410442; x=1755015242; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ut5lsjSSswYnbLzk6rrdmu5+CeAKFhijQRi1rB1wfMg=; b=wx79USt3Ijrv7F9dJ5zPWyZw9psisLB0mYeorSbrDyQjqfUBf8xXKgZWmCy9+bpmEI NsOQSPKcZhmj5okJHTHaeXJrCjt0+0kEDXMSSCqFF4ypECrAjg9Mqa+uoy6XQW8jMA6Z HhOYGAXrHy+bCSq0JJESfwr/muam04OZYoZLFL4Mw3/dUD+hzWy5Mz70SPM/lGsPlqGR FW9wV55/f5JWjawM1SacamRoVoYwv7sX5bhAWUq4WGl1su2Q/HM2Ix5r+roprpqF1sPH XBRQgUBk5WMsQ6kaxNXK1ylwKYXYSl5+uX46312Actj1UgIG67sg/BcVmq97aabj5nnW Y96Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBXXl7Ln8ePOt/LelC/47AUjsVXvr3aPHOVL7QwGqVc5pFYT1j1Z2e1MNh3RiYjrnwUBQzS243SljyeA==@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUYCQuoHFFsYcLtOpmBwSDPF0KAghyxY5nF8FAvFG4Q+VvV2lijReZePpr67eT/bw/AFL/CTrEMmFo/KilbGE0D5wSK@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUa0UAeg0sZyqKo/pYjy0MGDl3e7b/NsFK1EKVj+A2xR4u5QXE9yYMF+ogf3tuqwRaXeCyw8igidhx7IYy3@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCVRzqnQEWpS4yisO12QA03J8rA0KSLDSkQO9l6MXGLXU1kz2EuLKVXQjReyetwSbyw+eB1rw3Mmqi4WJIUyPg==@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCVjEelcX7AjVqrAjOGe/iWWj+BaB4QwssPJxvQQRTSUxlrifa0jfXjaHVmeoKISzeZMxgcGPS4E2Om8@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCWKdVjmu7PtpdRJn0EnQxgGH/0ush9kKfGE1O6tpN/2LAPHeGQ6MMxHWmCHE7vu6cioOgk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxgVvFVN1d7cyE2qfbqHEjKPXhjt7TIYRSMIjSxMUH+zl6P/8El PC34RCwbFvWQEtOmGfQZuUUdqoV9xsgEsXPydgi5zNJ0+eAJ45Zjc7N8 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv2m1NdzzRQhE1BgT7wneFjtgaQUh42bE1MXtBKurH6VPUQM3n7S/FFB7eujIL 80Sejdzh4+vE5PRMl3xJVPUWnfk8vKDcXphHC3zUk0g4FtZIcnpYCB9Hzz5XfaiLWosaEnV0fIn /s/gDY+7JkzAQXU6scowMADMhEJPRb+9ZGRGtnETnNmwW5nyQOoNCDCap9+RBTO1KT90DejATDa RZBXMxPEA2BqPI+TTnAEY6w8WiF7ngq+154gH+UZncedd4YGQnFPS796Fl/g3sJX5rLsaOLlBBw JB9VsbWJQaM9wjqYVQ0l62+8xq1jV0UK5JDGiJcmslAc5GtEReC9yiDUOGbJep4F20AZKrEDbyg lrlIOfVOliLyfdhnOD8yMSnqzpAQU0YP0g+rLanYoASb9qPS1XQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH0xPAx9h/e+86wx2UChAIDs8RS46jNjVMEpxxiiDlgZAALsSVVnEbgPp+pN/RR7dfa5MNCmA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:b0f:b0:332:341d:9531 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-3327b9157d5mr10915411fa.12.1754410441379; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 09:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (host-95-203-18-142.mobileonline.telia.com. [95.203.18.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 38308e7fff4ca-33238272ff7sm20616811fa.7.2025.08.05.09.13.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Aug 2025 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 18:13:56 +0200 To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , Lorenzo Stoakes , Harry Yoo , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , "David S . Miller" , Andreas Larsson , Jarkko Sakkinen , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Kees Cook , Peter Xu , David Hildenbrand , Zi Yan , Baolin Wang , "Liam R . Howlett" , Nico Pache , Ryan Roberts , Dev Jain , Barry Song , Xu Xin , Chengming Zhou , Hugh Dickins , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Dan Williams , Matthew Wilcox , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , Jann Horn , Pedro Falcato , Johannes Weiner , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: update core kernel code to use vm_flags_t consistently Message-ID: References: <73764aaa-2186-4c8e-8523-55705018d842@lucifer.local> <69860c97-8a76-4ce5-b1d6-9d7c8370d9cd@lucifer.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 12:37:57PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 12:54:21PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > Hello, Lorenzo! > > > > > So sorry Ulad, I meant to get back to you on this sooner! > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 08:39:01PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 06:25:39AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > > > > Andrew - FYI there's nothing to worry about here, the type remains > > > > > precisely the same, and I'll send a patch to fix this trivial issue so when > > > > > later this type changes vmalloc will be uaffected. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:15:51AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote: > > > > > > [Adding Uladzislau to Cc] > > > > > > > > > > Ulad - could we PLEASE get rid of 'vm_flags' in vmalloc? It's the precise > > > > > same name and (currently) type as vma->vm_flags and is already the source > > > > > of confusion. > > > > > > > > > You mean all "vm_flags" variable names? "vm_struct" has flags as a > > > > member. So you want: > > > > > > > > urezki@pc638:~/data/backup/coding/linux-not-broken.git$ grep -rn vm_flags mm/execmem.c > > > > 29: pgprot_t pgprot, unsigned long vm_flags) > > > > 39: vm_flags |= VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK; > > > > 41: if (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) > > > > 45: pgprot, vm_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > > 51: pgprot, vm_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > > 85: pgprot_t pgprot, unsigned long vm_flags) > > > > 259: unsigned long vm_flags = VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP; > > > > 266: p = execmem_vmalloc(range, alloc_size, PAGE_KERNEL, vm_flags); > > > > 376: unsigned long vm_flags = VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS; > > > > 385: p = execmem_vmalloc(range, size, pgprot, vm_flags); > > > > urezki@pc638:~/data/backup/coding/linux-not-broken.git$ grep -rn vm_flags mm/vmalloc.c > > > > 3853: * @vm_flags: additional vm area flags (e.g. %VM_NO_GUARD) > > > > 3875: pgprot_t prot, unsigned long vm_flags, int node, > > > > 3894: if (vmap_allow_huge && (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) { > > > > 3912: VM_UNINITIALIZED | vm_flags, start, end, node, > > > > 3977: if (!(vm_flags & VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK)) > > > > 4621: vm_flags_set(vma, VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP); > > > > urezki@pc638:~/data/backup/coding/linux-not-broken.git$ grep -rn vm_flags mm/execmem.c > > > > 29: pgprot_t pgprot, unsigned long vm_flags) > > > > 39: vm_flags |= VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK; > > > > 41: if (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) > > > > 45: pgprot, vm_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > > 51: pgprot, vm_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > > 85: pgprot_t pgprot, unsigned long vm_flags) > > > > 259: unsigned long vm_flags = VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP; > > > > 266: p = execmem_vmalloc(range, alloc_size, PAGE_KERNEL, vm_flags); > > > > 376: unsigned long vm_flags = VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS; > > > > 385: p = execmem_vmalloc(range, size, pgprot, vm_flags); > > > > urezki@pc638:~/data/backup/coding/linux-not-broken.git$ grep -rn vm_flags ./include/linux/vmalloc.h > > > > 172: pgprot_t prot, unsigned long vm_flags, int node, > > > > urezki@pc638:~/data/backup/coding/linux-not-broken.git$ > > > > > > > > to rename all those "vm_flags" to something, for example, like "flags"? > > > > > > Yeah, sorry I know it's a churny pain, but I think it's such a silly source > > > of confusion _in general_, not only this series where I made a mistake (of > > > course entirely my fault but certainly more understandable given the > > > naming), but in the past I've certainly sat there thinking 'hmmm wait' :) > > > > > > Really I think we should rename 'vm_struct' too, but if that causes _too > > > much_ churn fair enough. > > Well, it's not that terrible :) > > ~/git/linux$ git grep -w vm_struct | wc -l > 173 > Indeed :) > > > I think even though it's long-winded, 'vmalloc_flags' would be good, both > > > in fields and local params as it makes things very very clear. > > > > > > Equally 'vm_struct' -> 'vmalloc_struct' would be a good change. > > Do we really need the _struct suffix? > How about vmalloc_area? > I think, we should not use vmalloc_ prefix here, because vmalloc operates within its own range: VMALLOC_START:VMALLOC_END, therefore it might be confusing also. others can use another regions. vmap_mapping? > > It also seems that struct vmap_area can be made private to mm/. > I agree. Also it can be even moved under vmalloc.c. There is only one user which needs it globally, it is usercopy.c. It uses find_vmap_area() which is wrong. See: if (is_vmalloc_addr(ptr) && !pagefault_disabled()) { struct vmap_area *area = find_vmap_area(addr); if (!area) usercopy_abort("vmalloc", "no area", to_user, 0, n); if (n > area->va_end - addr) { offset = addr - area->va_start; usercopy_abort("vmalloc", NULL, to_user, offset, n); } return; } we can add a function which just assign va_start, va_end as input parameters and use them in the usercopy.c. Thanks! -- Uladzislau Rezki