sparclinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
                   ` (12 more replies)
  0 siblings, 13 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

For improved const-correctness.

This patch series systematically adds const qualifiers to pointer
parameters throughout the memory management (mm) subsystem,
establishing a foundation for improved const-correctness across the
entire Linux kernel.

Const-correctness provides multiple benefits:

1. Type Safety: The compiler enforces that functions marked as taking
   const parameters cannot accidentally modify the data, catching
   potential bugs at compile time rather than runtime.

2. Compiler Optimizations: When the compiler knows data won't be
   modified, it can generate more efficient code through better
   register allocation, code motion, and aliasing analysis.

3. API Documentation: Const qualifiers serve as self-documenting code,
   making it immediately clear to developers which functions are
   read-only operations versus those that modify state.

4. Maintenance Safety: Future modifications to const-correct code are
   less likely to introduce subtle bugs, as the compiler will reject
   attempts to modify data that should remain unchanged.

The memory management subsystem is a fundamental building block of the kernel.
Most higher-level kernel subsystems (filesystems, drivers, networking) depend
on mm interfaces. By establishing const-correctness at this foundational level:

1. Enables Propagation: Higher-level subsystems can adopt const-correctness
   in their own interfaces. Without const-correct mm functions, filesystems
   cannot mark their own parameters const when they need to call mm functions.

2. Maximum Impact: Changes to core mm APIs benefit the entire kernel, as
   these functions are called from virtually every subsystem.

3. Prevents Impedance Mismatch: Without const-correctness in mm, other
   subsystems must either cast away const (dangerous) or avoid using const
   altogether (missing optimization opportunities).

This series adds const qualifiers to pointer parameters in functions that
perform read-only operations on:
- struct page, folio, and ptdesc
- struct vm_area_struct and vm_fault
- struct mm_struct and address_space
- struct zone, lruvec, and mem_section
- Various architecture-specific mm structures

Each patch focuses on a specific header or subsystem component to ease review
and bisection.

This work was initially posted as a single large patch:
 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250827192233.447920-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com/

Following feedback from Lorenzo Stoakes and David Hildenbrand, it has been
split into focused, reviewable chunks. The approach was validated with a
smaller patch that received agreement:
 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250828130311.772993-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com/

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- made several parameter values const (i.e. the pointer address, not
  just the pointed-to memory), as suggested by Andrew Morton and
  Yuanchu Xie
- drop existing+obsolete "extern" keywords on lines modified by these
  patches (suggested by Vishal Moola)
- add missing parameter names on lines modified by these patches
  (suggested by Vishal Moola)
- more "const" pointers (e.g. the task_struct passed to
  process_shares_mm())
- add missing "const" to s390, fixing s390 build failure
- moved the mmap_is_legacy() change in arch/s390/mm/mmap.c from 08/12
  to 06/12 (suggested by Vishal Moola)

v2 -> v3:
- remove garbage from 06/12
- changed tags on subject line (suggested by Matthew Wilcox)

v3 -> v4:
- more verbose commit messages including a listing of function names
  (suggested by David Hildenbrand and Lorenzo Stoakes)

Max Kellermann (12):
  mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  mm/pagemap: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  mm/mmzone: add const to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  fs: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  mm/oom_kill: add const to pointer parameter for improved
    const-correctness
  mm/util, s390: add const to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  parisc: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter
  mm/util, s390, sparc, x86: add const to arch_pick_mmap_layout()
    parameter
  mm/mm_types: add const to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  mm/mm_inline: add const to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness
  mm: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  mm/highmem: add const to pointer parameters for improved
    const-correctness

 arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h      |  6 +--
 arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h |  2 +-
 arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c     |  2 +-
 arch/s390/mm/mmap.c                 |  7 ++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c    |  3 +-
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c                  |  7 ++--
 arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h   |  2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h                  |  7 ++--
 include/linux/highmem-internal.h    | 38 ++++++++++---------
 include/linux/highmem.h             |  8 ++--
 include/linux/mm.h                  | 48 +++++++++++------------
 include/linux/mm_inline.h           | 26 +++++++------
 include/linux/mm_types.h            |  4 +-
 include/linux/mmzone.h              | 42 ++++++++++----------
 include/linux/pagemap.h             | 59 +++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/sched/mm.h            |  4 +-
 include/linux/shmem_fs.h            |  4 +-
 mm/highmem.c                        | 10 ++---
 mm/oom_kill.c                       |  3 +-
 mm/shmem.c                          |  6 +--
 mm/util.c                           | 20 ++++++----
 21 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/pagemap: " Max Kellermann
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to vm_area_struct and address_space
pointer parameters in shmem functions that do not modify the referenced
memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- vma_is_shmem()
- vma_is_anon_shmem()
- shmem_mapping()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h       | 8 ++++----
 include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 4 ++--
 mm/shmem.c               | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index cd14298bb958..18deb14cb1f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -979,11 +979,11 @@ static inline void vma_iter_set(struct vma_iterator *vmi, unsigned long addr)
  * The vma_is_shmem is not inline because it is used only by slow
  * paths in userfault.
  */
-bool vma_is_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
-bool vma_is_anon_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+bool vma_is_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+bool vma_is_anon_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma);
 #else
-static inline bool vma_is_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false; }
-static inline bool vma_is_anon_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false; }
+static inline bool vma_is_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false; }
+static inline bool vma_is_anon_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false; }
 #endif
 
 int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
index 6d0f9c599ff7..0e47465ef0fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ extern unsigned long shmem_get_unmapped_area(struct file *, unsigned long addr,
 		unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags);
 extern int shmem_lock(struct file *file, int lock, struct ucounts *ucounts);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SHMEM
-bool shmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping);
+bool shmem_mapping(const struct address_space *mapping);
 #else
-static inline bool shmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool shmem_mapping(const struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	return false;
 }
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 640fecc42f60..d55bceaa1c80 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -275,18 +275,18 @@ static const struct vm_operations_struct shmem_vm_ops;
 static const struct vm_operations_struct shmem_anon_vm_ops;
 static struct file_system_type shmem_fs_type;
 
-bool shmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
+bool shmem_mapping(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->a_ops == &shmem_aops;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shmem_mapping);
 
-bool vma_is_anon_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+bool vma_is_anon_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	return vma->vm_ops == &shmem_anon_vm_ops;
 }
 
-bool vma_is_shmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+bool vma_is_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	return vma_is_anon_shmem(vma) || vma->vm_ops == &shmem_vm_ops;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/pagemap: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/mmzone: add const " Max Kellermann
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to address_space, folio, vm_area_struct,
readahead_control, and inode pointer parameters in pagemap.h functions
that do not modify the referenced memory, improving type safety and
enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- mapping_empty()
- mapping_shrinkable()
- mapping_unevictable()
- mapping_exiting()
- mapping_use_writeback_tags()
- mapping_inaccessible()
- mapping_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim()
- mapping_gfp_mask()
- mapping_gfp_constraint()
- mapping_min_folio_nrpages()
- mapping_min_folio_nrbytes()
- mapping_align_index()
- mapping_large_folio_support()
- filemap_nr_thps()
- folio_next_index()
- folio_contains()
- folio_pgoff()
- linear_page_index()
- readahead_pos()
- readahead_length()
- readahead_index()
- readahead_count()
- readahead_batch_length()
- dir_pages()
- folio_mkwrite_check_truncate()

Constify pagemap related test functions for improved
const-correctness.

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/pagemap.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index a3e16d74792f..1d35f9e1416e 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static inline int inode_drain_writes(struct inode *inode)
 	return filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
 }
 
-static inline bool mapping_empty(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_empty(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return xa_empty(&mapping->i_pages);
 }
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static inline bool mapping_empty(struct address_space *mapping)
  * refcount and the referenced bit, which will be elevated or set in
  * the process of adding new cache pages to an inode.
  */
-static inline bool mapping_shrinkable(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_shrinkable(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	void *head;
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static inline void mapping_clear_unevictable(struct address_space *mapping)
 	clear_bit(AS_UNEVICTABLE, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline bool mapping_unevictable(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_unevictable(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return mapping && test_bit(AS_UNEVICTABLE, &mapping->flags);
 }
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static inline void mapping_set_exiting(struct address_space *mapping)
 	set_bit(AS_EXITING, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline int mapping_exiting(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline int mapping_exiting(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return test_bit(AS_EXITING, &mapping->flags);
 }
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline void mapping_set_no_writeback_tags(struct address_space *mapping)
 	set_bit(AS_NO_WRITEBACK_TAGS, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline int mapping_use_writeback_tags(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline int mapping_use_writeback_tags(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return !test_bit(AS_NO_WRITEBACK_TAGS, &mapping->flags);
 }
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static inline void mapping_set_inaccessible(struct address_space *mapping)
 	set_bit(AS_INACCESSIBLE, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline bool mapping_inaccessible(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_inaccessible(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return test_bit(AS_INACCESSIBLE, &mapping->flags);
 }
@@ -343,18 +343,18 @@ static inline void mapping_set_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(struct address_
 	set_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline bool mapping_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return test_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
-static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(struct address_space * mapping)
+static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->gfp_mask;
 }
 
 /* Restricts the given gfp_mask to what the mapping allows. */
-static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_constraint(struct address_space *mapping,
+static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_constraint(const struct address_space *mapping,
 		gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	return mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & gfp_mask;
@@ -477,13 +477,13 @@ mapping_min_folio_order(const struct address_space *mapping)
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long
-mapping_min_folio_nrpages(struct address_space *mapping)
+mapping_min_folio_nrpages(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return 1UL << mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long
-mapping_min_folio_nrbytes(struct address_space *mapping)
+mapping_min_folio_nrbytes(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping) << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ mapping_min_folio_nrbytes(struct address_space *mapping)
  * new folio to the page cache and need to know what index to give it,
  * call this function.
  */
-static inline pgoff_t mapping_align_index(struct address_space *mapping,
+static inline pgoff_t mapping_align_index(const struct address_space *const mapping,
 					  pgoff_t index)
 {
 	return round_down(index, mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping));
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static inline pgoff_t mapping_align_index(struct address_space *mapping,
  * Large folio support currently depends on THP.  These dependencies are
  * being worked on but are not yet fixed.
  */
-static inline bool mapping_large_folio_support(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline bool mapping_large_folio_support(const struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	/* AS_FOLIO_ORDER is only reasonable for pagecache folios */
 	VM_WARN_ONCE((unsigned long)mapping & FOLIO_MAPPING_ANON,
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static inline size_t mapping_max_folio_size(const struct address_space *mapping)
 	return PAGE_SIZE << mapping_max_folio_order(mapping);
 }
 
-static inline int filemap_nr_thps(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline int filemap_nr_thps(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS
 	return atomic_read(&mapping->nr_thps);
@@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ static inline struct page *grab_cache_page_nowait(struct address_space *mapping,
  *
  * Return: The index of the folio which follows this folio in the file.
  */
-static inline pgoff_t folio_next_index(struct folio *folio)
+static inline pgoff_t folio_next_index(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	return folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio);
 }
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static inline struct page *folio_file_page(struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index)
  * e.g., shmem did not move this folio to the swap cache.
  * Return: true or false.
  */
-static inline bool folio_contains(struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index)
+static inline bool folio_contains(const struct folio *const folio, pgoff_t index)
 {
 	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
 	return index - folio->index < folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -1042,13 +1042,13 @@ static inline loff_t page_offset(struct page *page)
 /*
  * Get the offset in PAGE_SIZE (even for hugetlb folios).
  */
-static inline pgoff_t folio_pgoff(struct folio *folio)
+static inline pgoff_t folio_pgoff(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	return folio->index;
 }
 
-static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-					unsigned long address)
+static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma,
+					const unsigned long address)
 {
 	pgoff_t pgoff;
 	pgoff = (address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __readahead_batch(struct readahead_control *rac,
  * readahead_pos - The byte offset into the file of this readahead request.
  * @rac: The readahead request.
  */
-static inline loff_t readahead_pos(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline loff_t readahead_pos(const struct readahead_control *const rac)
 {
 	return (loff_t)rac->_index * PAGE_SIZE;
 }
@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ static inline loff_t readahead_pos(struct readahead_control *rac)
  * readahead_length - The number of bytes in this readahead request.
  * @rac: The readahead request.
  */
-static inline size_t readahead_length(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline size_t readahead_length(const struct readahead_control *const rac)
 {
 	return rac->_nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
 }
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static inline size_t readahead_length(struct readahead_control *rac)
  * readahead_index - The index of the first page in this readahead request.
  * @rac: The readahead request.
  */
-static inline pgoff_t readahead_index(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline pgoff_t readahead_index(const struct readahead_control *const rac)
 {
 	return rac->_index;
 }
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static inline pgoff_t readahead_index(struct readahead_control *rac)
  * readahead_count - The number of pages in this readahead request.
  * @rac: The readahead request.
  */
-static inline unsigned int readahead_count(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline unsigned int readahead_count(const struct readahead_control *const rac)
 {
 	return rac->_nr_pages;
 }
@@ -1504,12 +1504,12 @@ static inline unsigned int readahead_count(struct readahead_control *rac)
  * readahead_batch_length - The number of bytes in the current batch.
  * @rac: The readahead request.
  */
-static inline size_t readahead_batch_length(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline size_t readahead_batch_length(const struct readahead_control *const rac)
 {
 	return rac->_batch_count * PAGE_SIZE;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long dir_pages(struct inode *inode)
+static inline unsigned long dir_pages(const struct inode *const inode)
 {
 	return (unsigned long)(inode->i_size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >>
 			       PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -1523,8 +1523,8 @@ static inline unsigned long dir_pages(struct inode *inode)
  * Return: the number of bytes in the folio up to EOF,
  * or -EFAULT if the folio was truncated.
  */
-static inline ssize_t folio_mkwrite_check_truncate(struct folio *folio,
-					      struct inode *inode)
+static inline ssize_t folio_mkwrite_check_truncate(const struct folio *const folio,
+						   const struct inode *const inode)
 {
 	loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
 	pgoff_t index = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -1555,7 +1555,8 @@ static inline ssize_t folio_mkwrite_check_truncate(struct folio *folio,
  * Return: The number of filesystem blocks covered by this folio.
  */
 static inline
-unsigned int i_blocks_per_folio(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
+unsigned int i_blocks_per_folio(const struct inode *const inode,
+				const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	return folio_size(folio) >> inode->i_blkbits;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/mmzone: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/pagemap: " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] fs: " Max Kellermann
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to zone, zoneref, and mem_section pointer
parameters in mmzone.h functions that do not modify the referenced memory,
improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- zone_managed_pages()
- zone_is_initialized()
- zone_is_empty()
- zone_intersects()
- zone_is_zone_device()
- managed_zone()
- populated_zone()
- zone_to_nid()
- is_highmem()
- zonelist_zone_idx()
- zonelist_node_idx()
- present_section()
- valid_section()
- early_section()
- online_section()
- online_device_section()
- preinited_vmemmap_section()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index f3272ef5131b..9a25fb1ade82 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static inline unsigned long promo_wmark_pages(const struct zone *z)
 	return wmark_pages(z, WMARK_PROMO);
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long zone_managed_pages(struct zone *zone)
+static inline unsigned long zone_managed_pages(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return (unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&zone->managed_pages);
 }
@@ -1128,12 +1128,12 @@ static inline bool zone_spans_pfn(const struct zone *zone, unsigned long pfn)
 	return zone->zone_start_pfn <= pfn && pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone);
 }
 
-static inline bool zone_is_initialized(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool zone_is_initialized(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone->initialized;
 }
 
-static inline bool zone_is_empty(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool zone_is_empty(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone->spanned_pages == 0;
 }
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static inline bool folio_is_zone_movable(const struct folio *folio)
  * Return true if [start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages) range has a non-empty
  * intersection with the given zone
  */
-static inline bool zone_intersects(struct zone *zone,
+static inline bool zone_intersects(const struct zone *const zone,
 		unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
 {
 	if (zone_is_empty(zone))
@@ -1581,12 +1581,12 @@ static inline int local_memory_node(int node_id) { return node_id; };
 #define zone_idx(zone)		((zone) - (zone)->zone_pgdat->node_zones)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
-static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_DEVICE;
 }
 #else
-static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return false;
 }
@@ -1598,19 +1598,19 @@ static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(struct zone *zone)
  * populated_zone(). If the whole zone is reserved then we can easily
  * end up with populated_zone() && !managed_zone().
  */
-static inline bool managed_zone(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool managed_zone(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone_managed_pages(zone);
 }
 
 /* Returns true if a zone has memory */
-static inline bool populated_zone(struct zone *zone)
+static inline bool populated_zone(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone->present_pages;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-static inline int zone_to_nid(struct zone *zone)
+static inline int zone_to_nid(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return zone->node;
 }
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ static inline void zone_set_nid(struct zone *zone, int nid)
 	zone->node = nid;
 }
 #else
-static inline int zone_to_nid(struct zone *zone)
+static inline int zone_to_nid(const struct zone *zone)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ static inline int is_highmem_idx(enum zone_type idx)
  * @zone: pointer to struct zone variable
  * Return: 1 for a highmem zone, 0 otherwise
  */
-static inline int is_highmem(struct zone *zone)
+static inline int is_highmem(const struct zone *const zone)
 {
 	return is_highmem_idx(zone_idx(zone));
 }
@@ -1713,12 +1713,12 @@ static inline struct zone *zonelist_zone(struct zoneref *zoneref)
 	return zoneref->zone;
 }
 
-static inline int zonelist_zone_idx(struct zoneref *zoneref)
+static inline int zonelist_zone_idx(const struct zoneref *const zoneref)
 {
 	return zoneref->zone_idx;
 }
 
-static inline int zonelist_node_idx(struct zoneref *zoneref)
+static inline int zonelist_node_idx(const struct zoneref *const zoneref)
 {
 	return zone_to_nid(zoneref->zone);
 }
@@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ static inline struct page *__section_mem_map_addr(struct mem_section *section)
 	return (struct page *)map;
 }
 
-static inline int present_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int present_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT));
 }
@@ -2031,12 +2031,12 @@ static inline int present_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
 	return present_section(__nr_to_section(nr));
 }
 
-static inline int valid_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int valid_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP));
 }
 
-static inline int early_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int early_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_IS_EARLY));
 }
@@ -2046,27 +2046,27 @@ static inline int valid_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
 	return valid_section(__nr_to_section(nr));
 }
 
-static inline int online_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int online_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_IS_ONLINE));
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
-static inline int online_device_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int online_device_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	unsigned long flags = SECTION_IS_ONLINE | SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE;
 
 	return section && ((section->section_mem_map & flags) == flags);
 }
 #else
-static inline int online_device_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int online_device_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_PREINIT
-static inline int preinited_vmemmap_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int preinited_vmemmap_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return (section &&
 		(section->section_mem_map & SECTION_IS_VMEMMAP_PREINIT));
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ void sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_early(int nid);
 void sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_late(int nid);
 
 #else
-static inline int preinited_vmemmap_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int preinited_vmemmap_section(const struct mem_section *const section)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 04/12] fs: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/mmzone: add const " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/oom_kill: add const to pointer parameter " Max Kellermann
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to address_space pointer parameters
in filesystem-related functions that do not modify the referenced memory,
improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- mapping_tagged()
- mapping_mapped()
- mapping_writably_mapped()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/fs.h | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 3b9f54446db0..8dc46337467d 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ struct address_space {
 /*
  * Returns true if any of the pages in the mapping are marked with the tag.
  */
-static inline bool mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, xa_mark_t tag)
+static inline bool mapping_tagged(const struct address_space *const mapping,
+				  const xa_mark_t tag)
 {
 	return xa_marked(&mapping->i_pages, tag);
 }
@@ -585,7 +586,7 @@ static inline void i_mmap_assert_write_locked(struct address_space *mapping)
 /*
  * Might pages of this file be mapped into userspace?
  */
-static inline int mapping_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline int mapping_mapped(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return	!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root);
 }
@@ -599,7 +600,7 @@ static inline int mapping_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
  * If i_mmap_writable is negative, no new writable mappings are allowed. You
  * can only deny writable mappings, if none exists right now.
  */
-static inline int mapping_writably_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
+static inline int mapping_writably_mapped(const struct address_space *const mapping)
 {
 	return atomic_read(&mapping->i_mmap_writable) > 0;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/oom_kill: add const to pointer parameter for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] fs: " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/util, s390: add const to pointer parameters " Max Kellermann
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to task_struct and mm_struct pointer
parameters in the OOM killer code that do not modify the referenced
memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- process_shares_mm()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
 mm/oom_kill.c      | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 18deb14cb1f5..f70c6b4d5f80 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3840,7 +3840,7 @@ static inline int in_gate_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 }
 #endif	/* __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA */
 
-extern bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm);
+bool process_shares_mm(const struct task_struct *p, const struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 void drop_slab(void);
 
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 17650f0b516e..2620b32a8eba 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -490,7 +490,8 @@ static bool oom_killer_disabled __read_mostly;
  * task's threads: if one of those is using this mm then this task was also
  * using it.
  */
-bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
+bool process_shares_mm(const struct task_struct *const p,
+		       const struct mm_struct *const mm)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/util, s390: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/oom_kill: add const to pointer parameter " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] parisc: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter Max Kellermann
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to rlimit, vm_area_struct, mm_struct,
and folio pointer parameters in mm/util.c and s390 arch code that do not
modify the referenced memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler
optimizations.

Functions improved:
- mmap_is_legacy() (both mm/util.c and s390)
- vma_is_stack_for_current()
- __vm_enough_memory()
- folio_mapping()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 arch/s390/mm/mmap.c     |  2 +-
 include/linux/mm.h      |  6 +++---
 include/linux/pagemap.h |  2 +-
 mm/util.c               | 11 ++++++-----
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
index 547104ccc22a..c0f619fb9ab3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_size(void)
 	return STACK_RND_MASK << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
-static inline int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+static inline int mmap_is_legacy(const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
 		return 1;
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index f70c6b4d5f80..23864c3519d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false
 static inline bool vma_is_anon_shmem(const struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return false; }
 #endif
 
-int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+int vma_is_stack_for_current(const struct vm_area_struct *vma);
 
 /* flush_tlb_range() takes a vma, not a mm, and can care about flags */
 #define TLB_FLUSH_VMA(mm,flags) { .vm_mm = (mm), .vm_flags = (flags) }
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ void folio_add_pin(struct folio *folio);
 
 int account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc);
 int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc,
-			struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim);
+			const struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim);
 
 struct kvec;
 struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr, int *locked);
@@ -3348,7 +3348,7 @@ void anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(struct anon_vma_chain *node);
 	     avc; avc = anon_vma_interval_tree_iter_next(avc, start, last))
 
 /* mmap.c */
-extern int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin);
+extern int __vm_enough_memory(const struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin);
 extern int insert_vm_struct(struct mm_struct *, struct vm_area_struct *);
 extern void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *);
 bool mmap_read_lock_maybe_expand(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 1d35f9e1416e..968b58a97236 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static inline void filemap_nr_thps_dec(struct address_space *mapping)
 #endif
 }
 
-struct address_space *folio_mapping(struct folio *);
+struct address_space *folio_mapping(const struct folio *folio);
 
 /**
  * folio_flush_mapping - Find the file mapping this folio belongs to.
diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index d235b74f7aff..f5a35efba7bf 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void *memdup_user_nul(const void __user *src, size_t len)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(memdup_user_nul);
 
 /* Check if the vma is being used as a stack by this task */
-int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+int vma_is_stack_for_current(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	struct task_struct * __maybe_unused t = current;
 
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
 	return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
-static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+static int mmap_is_legacy(const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
 		return 1;
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arch_pick_mmap_layout);
  * * -ENOMEM if RLIMIT_MEMLOCK would be exceeded.
  */
 int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc,
-			struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim)
+			const struct task_struct *const task, const bool bypass_rlim)
 {
 	unsigned long locked_vm, limit;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ struct anon_vma *folio_anon_vma(const struct folio *folio)
  * You can call this for folios which aren't in the swap cache or page
  * cache and it will return NULL.
  */
-struct address_space *folio_mapping(struct folio *folio)
+struct address_space *folio_mapping(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping;
 
@@ -926,7 +926,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_memory_committed);
  * Note this is a helper function intended to be used by LSMs which
  * wish to use this logic.
  */
-int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
+int __vm_enough_memory(const struct mm_struct *const mm,
+		       const long pages, const int cap_sys_admin)
 {
 	long allowed;
 	unsigned long bytes_failed;
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 07/12] parisc: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/util, s390: add const to pointer parameters " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/util, s390, sparc, x86: add const to arch_pick_mmap_layout() parameter Max Kellermann
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifier to the rlimit pointer parameter in
parisc's mmap_upper_limit() function that does not modify the referenced
memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- mmap_upper_limit()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
 arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h
index 4c14bde39aac..dd0b5e199559 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
 
 struct rlimit;
-unsigned long mmap_upper_limit(struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
+unsigned long mmap_upper_limit(const struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
 unsigned long calc_max_stack_size(unsigned long stack_max);
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
index f852fe274abe..c2bbaef7e6b7 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ unsigned long calc_max_stack_size(unsigned long stack_max)
  * indicating that "current" should be used instead of a passed-in
  * value from the exec bprm as done with arch_pick_mmap_layout().
  */
-unsigned long mmap_upper_limit(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+unsigned long mmap_upper_limit(const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long stack_base;
 
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/util, s390, sparc, x86: add const to arch_pick_mmap_layout() parameter
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] parisc: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/mm_types: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to mm_struct and rlimit pointer
parameters in arch_pick_mmap_layout() across multiple architectures,
improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- arch_pick_mmap_layout() (s390, sparc, x86, and generic mm/util.c)
- mmap_base() (x86)

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
 arch/s390/mm/mmap.c              | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c | 3 ++-
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c               | 7 ++++---
 include/linux/sched/mm.h         | 4 ++--
 mm/util.c                        | 9 ++++++---
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
index c0f619fb9ab3..a47c7133d82a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/mmap.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static unsigned long mmap_base_legacy(unsigned long rnd)
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd,
-				      struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+				      const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
 	unsigned long pad = stack_maxrandom_size() + stack_guard_gap;
@@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long ad
  * This function, called very early during the creation of a new
  * process VM image, sets up which VM layout function to use:
  */
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *const mm,
+			   const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
 
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
index 785e9909340f..1c243bb461b2 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
@@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static unsigned long mmap_rnd(void)
 	return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *const mm,
+			   const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long random_factor = mmap_rnd();
 	unsigned long gap;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index 708f85dc9380..13bde4ba2f24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
 }
 
 static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, unsigned long task_size,
-			       struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+			       const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
 	unsigned long pad = stack_maxrandom_size(task_size) + stack_guard_gap;
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static unsigned long mmap_legacy_base(unsigned long rnd,
  */
 static void arch_pick_mmap_base(unsigned long *base, unsigned long *legacy_base,
 		unsigned long random_factor, unsigned long task_size,
-		struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+		const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	*legacy_base = mmap_legacy_base(random_factor, task_size);
 	if (mmap_is_legacy())
@@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ static void arch_pick_mmap_base(unsigned long *base, unsigned long *legacy_base,
 		*base = mmap_base(random_factor, task_size, rlim_stack);
 }
 
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *const mm,
+			   const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	if (mmap_is_legacy())
 		mm_flags_clear(MMF_TOPDOWN, mm);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 2201da0afecc..0232d983b715 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
 #endif
 
 extern void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm,
-				  struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
+				  const struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
 
 unsigned long
 arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ generic_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
 				  unsigned long flags, vm_flags_t vm_flags);
 #else
 static inline void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm,
-					 struct rlimit *rlim_stack) {}
+					 const struct rlimit *rlim_stack) {}
 #endif
 
 static inline bool in_vfork(struct task_struct *tsk)
diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index f5a35efba7bf..24f08217cd95 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -431,7 +431,8 @@ static int mmap_is_legacy(const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 #define MIN_GAP		(SZ_128M)
 #define MAX_GAP		(STACK_TOP / 6 * 5)
 
-static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+static unsigned long mmap_base(const unsigned long rnd,
+			       const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
 	/*
@@ -462,7 +463,8 @@ static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
 #endif
 }
 
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *const mm,
+			   const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
 
@@ -478,7 +480,8 @@ void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
 	}
 }
 #elif defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT)
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
+void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *const mm,
+			   const struct rlimit *const rlim_stack)
 {
 	mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
 	mm_flags_clear(MMF_TOPDOWN, mm);
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/mm_types: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/util, s390, sparc, x86: add const to arch_pick_mmap_layout() parameter Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/mm_inline: " Max Kellermann
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to ptdesc and folio pointer parameters
in mm_types.h functions that do not modify the referenced memory,
improving type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- ptdesc_pmd_pts_count()
- folio_get_private()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index d934a3a5b443..46e27ee14bcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static inline void ptdesc_pmd_pts_dec(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
 	atomic_dec(&ptdesc->pt_share_count);
 }
 
-static inline int ptdesc_pmd_pts_count(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
+static inline int ptdesc_pmd_pts_count(const struct ptdesc *const ptdesc)
 {
 	return atomic_read(&ptdesc->pt_share_count);
 }
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static inline void set_page_private(struct page *page, unsigned long private)
 	page->private = private;
 }
 
-static inline void *folio_get_private(struct folio *folio)
+static inline void *folio_get_private(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	return folio->private;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/mm_inline: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/mm_types: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm: " Max Kellermann
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to folio, lruvec, mm_struct, and
vm_area_struct pointer parameters in mm_inline.h functions that do not
modify the referenced memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler
optimizations.

Functions improved:
- folio_is_file_lru()
- folio_lru_list()
- folio_lru_refs()
- folio_lru_gen()
- lru_gen_is_active()
- lru_gen_folio_seq()
- folio_migrate_refs()
- mm_tlb_flush_pending()
- mm_tlb_flush_nested()
- vma_has_recency()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_inline.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
index 150302b4a905..8c4f6f95ba9f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  * 0 if @folio is a normal anonymous folio, a tmpfs folio or otherwise
  * ram or swap backed folio.
  */
-static inline int folio_is_file_lru(struct folio *folio)
+static inline int folio_is_file_lru(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	return !folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
 }
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_clear_lru_flags(struct folio *folio)
  * Return: The LRU list a folio should be on, as an index
  * into the array of LRU lists.
  */
-static __always_inline enum lru_list folio_lru_list(struct folio *folio)
+static __always_inline enum lru_list folio_lru_list(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	enum lru_list lru;
 
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static inline int lru_tier_from_refs(int refs, bool workingset)
 	return workingset ? MAX_NR_TIERS - 1 : order_base_2(refs);
 }
 
-static inline int folio_lru_refs(struct folio *folio)
+static inline int folio_lru_refs(const struct folio *const folio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags = READ_ONCE(folio->flags.f);
 
@@ -154,14 +154,14 @@ static inline int folio_lru_refs(struct folio *folio)
 	return ((flags & LRU_REFS_MASK) >> LRU_REFS_PGOFF) + 1;
 }
 
-static inline int folio_lru_gen(struct folio *folio)
+static inline int folio_lru_gen(const struct folio *folio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags = READ_ONCE(folio->flags.f);
 
 	return ((flags & LRU_GEN_MASK) >> LRU_GEN_PGOFF) - 1;
 }
 
-static inline bool lru_gen_is_active(struct lruvec *lruvec, int gen)
+static inline bool lru_gen_is_active(const struct lruvec *const lruvec, const int gen)
 {
 	unsigned long max_seq = lruvec->lrugen.max_seq;
 
@@ -217,12 +217,13 @@ static inline void lru_gen_update_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *foli
 	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(lru_gen_is_active(lruvec, old_gen) && !lru_gen_is_active(lruvec, new_gen));
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long lru_gen_folio_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio,
+static inline unsigned long lru_gen_folio_seq(const struct lruvec *const lruvec,
+					      const struct folio *const folio,
 					      bool reclaiming)
 {
 	int gen;
 	int type = folio_is_file_lru(folio);
-	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
+	const struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
 
 	/*
 	 * +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
@@ -302,7 +303,8 @@ static inline bool lru_gen_del_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio,
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *new, struct folio *old)
+static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *const new,
+				      const struct folio *const old)
 {
 	unsigned long refs = READ_ONCE(old->flags.f) & LRU_REFS_MASK;
 
@@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ static inline bool lru_gen_del_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio,
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *new, struct folio *old)
+static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *new, const struct folio *old)
 {
 
 }
@@ -508,7 +510,7 @@ static inline void dec_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	atomic_dec(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
 }
 
-static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_pending(const struct mm_struct *const mm)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Must be called after having acquired the PTL; orders against that
@@ -521,7 +523,7 @@ static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return atomic_read(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
 }
 
-static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_nested(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_nested(const struct mm_struct *const mm)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Similar to mm_tlb_flush_pending(), we must have acquired the PTL
@@ -605,7 +607,7 @@ pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_has_recency(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_has_recency(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_SEQ_READ | VM_RAND_READ))
 		return false;
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 11/12] mm: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/mm_inline: " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/highmem: " Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Lorenzo Stoakes
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to vm_area_struct, vm_fault, page, and
vmem_altmap pointer parameters in core mm functions that do not modify
the referenced memory, improving type safety and enabling compiler
optimizations.

Functions improved:
- assert_fault_locked()
- vma_is_temporary_stack()
- vma_is_foreign()
- vma_is_accessible()
- vma_is_shared_maywrite()
- stack_guard_start_gap()
- vm_start_gap()
- vm_end_gap()
- vma_pages()
- range_in_vma()
- gup_can_follow_protnone()
- page_is_guard()
- vmem_altmap_offset()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 23864c3519d6..08ea6e7c0329 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static inline void release_fault_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		mmap_read_unlock(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
 }
 
-static inline void assert_fault_locked(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+static inline void assert_fault_locked(struct vm_fault *const vmf)
 {
 	if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK)
 		vma_assert_locked(vmf->vma);
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static inline void release_fault_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	mmap_read_unlock(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
 }
 
-static inline void assert_fault_locked(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+static inline void assert_fault_locked(const struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	mmap_assert_locked(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
 }
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_initial_stack(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 		vma->vm_end >= vma->vm_mm->start_stack;
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_is_temporary_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_is_temporary_stack(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	int maybe_stack = vma->vm_flags & (VM_GROWSDOWN | VM_GROWSUP);
 
@@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_temporary_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_is_foreign(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_is_foreign(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	if (!current->mm)
 		return true;
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_foreign(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_is_accessible(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_is_accessible(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	return vma->vm_flags & VM_ACCESS_FLAGS;
 }
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static inline bool is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
 		(VM_SHARED | VM_MAYWRITE);
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_is_shared_maywrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_is_shared_maywrite(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	return is_shared_maywrite(vma->vm_flags);
 }
@@ -3488,7 +3488,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_lookup(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 	return mtree_load(&mm->mm_mt, addr);
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long stack_guard_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline unsigned long stack_guard_start_gap(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)
 		return stack_guard_gap;
@@ -3500,7 +3500,7 @@ static inline unsigned long stack_guard_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long vm_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline unsigned long vm_start_gap(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	unsigned long gap = stack_guard_start_gap(vma);
 	unsigned long vm_start = vma->vm_start;
@@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ static inline unsigned long vm_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return vm_start;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long vm_end_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline unsigned long vm_end_gap(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	unsigned long vm_end = vma->vm_end;
 
@@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ static inline unsigned long vm_end_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return vm_end;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long vma_pages(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline unsigned long vma_pages(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma)
 {
 	return (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
@@ -3540,7 +3540,7 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *find_exact_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return vma;
 }
 
-static inline bool range_in_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+static inline bool range_in_vma(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma,
 				unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 	return (vma && vma->vm_start <= start && end <= vma->vm_end);
@@ -3656,7 +3656,7 @@ static inline int vm_fault_to_errno(vm_fault_t vm_fault, int foll_flags)
  * Indicates whether GUP can follow a PROT_NONE mapped page, or whether
  * a (NUMA hinting) fault is required.
  */
-static inline bool gup_can_follow_protnone(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+static inline bool gup_can_follow_protnone(const struct vm_area_struct *const vma,
 					   unsigned int flags)
 {
 	/*
@@ -3786,7 +3786,7 @@ static inline bool debug_guardpage_enabled(void)
 	return static_branch_unlikely(&_debug_guardpage_enabled);
 }
 
-static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page)
+static inline bool page_is_guard(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	if (!debug_guardpage_enabled())
 		return false;
@@ -3817,7 +3817,7 @@ static inline void debug_pagealloc_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages) {}
 static inline void debug_pagealloc_unmap_pages(struct page *page, int numpages) {}
 static inline unsigned int debug_guardpage_minorder(void) { return 0; }
 static inline bool debug_guardpage_enabled(void) { return false; }
-static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page) { return false; }
+static inline bool page_is_guard(const struct page *const page) { return false; }
 static inline bool set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
 			unsigned int order) { return false; }
 static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
@@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@ void vmemmap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
-static inline unsigned long vmem_altmap_offset(struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
+static inline unsigned long vmem_altmap_offset(const struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
 {
 	/* number of pfns from base where pfn_to_page() is valid */
 	if (altmap)
@@ -3913,7 +3913,7 @@ static inline void vmem_altmap_free(struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
 	altmap->alloc -= nr_pfns;
 }
 #else
-static inline unsigned long vmem_altmap_offset(struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
+static inline unsigned long vmem_altmap_offset(const struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/highmem: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm: " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:19 ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Lorenzo Stoakes
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, vbabka,
	rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller,
	agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem,
	andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa,
	chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang,
	rientjes, shakeel.butt, max.kellermann, thuth, broonie, osalvador,
	jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390,
	sparclinux, linux-fsdevel

The memory management (mm) subsystem is a fundamental low-level component
of the Linux kernel. Establishing const-correctness at this foundational
level enables higher-level subsystems, such as filesystems and drivers,
to also adopt const-correctness in their interfaces. This patch lays
the groundwork for broader const-correctness throughout the kernel
by starting with the core mm subsystem.

This patch adds const qualifiers to folio and page pointer parameters
in highmem functions that do not modify the referenced memory, improving
type safety and enabling compiler optimizations.

Functions improved:
- kmap_high_get()
- arch_kmap_local_high_get()
- get_pkmap_color()
- __kmap_local_page_prot()
- kunmap_high()
- kunmap()
- kmap_local_page()
- kmap_local_page_try_from_panic()
- kmap_local_folio()
- kmap_local_page_prot()
- kmap_atomic_prot()
- kmap_atomic()

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h    |  6 ++---
 arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h |  2 +-
 include/linux/highmem-internal.h  | 38 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/highmem.h           |  8 +++----
 mm/highmem.c                      | 10 ++++----
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h
index b4b66220952d..023be74298f3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ extern pte_t *pkmap_page_table;
 #endif
 
 #ifdef ARCH_NEEDS_KMAP_HIGH_GET
-extern void *kmap_high_get(struct page *page);
+extern void *kmap_high_get(const struct page *page);
 
-static inline void *arch_kmap_local_high_get(struct page *page)
+static inline void *arch_kmap_local_high_get(const struct page *page)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM) && !cache_is_vivt())
 		return NULL;
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void *arch_kmap_local_high_get(struct page *page)
 #define arch_kmap_local_high_get arch_kmap_local_high_get
 
 #else /* ARCH_NEEDS_KMAP_HIGH_GET */
-static inline void *kmap_high_get(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_high_get(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h
index 34b8b620e7f1..473b622b863b 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/highmem.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 
 #if DCACHE_WAY_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE
 #define get_pkmap_color get_pkmap_color
-static inline int get_pkmap_color(struct page *page)
+static inline int get_pkmap_color(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return DCACHE_ALIAS(page_to_phys(page));
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
index 36053c3d6d64..ca2ba47c14e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL
 void *__kmap_local_pfn_prot(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot);
-void *__kmap_local_page_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot);
+void *__kmap_local_page_prot(const struct page *page, pgprot_t prot);
 void kunmap_local_indexed(const void *vaddr);
 void kmap_local_fork(struct task_struct *tsk);
 void __kmap_local_sched_out(void);
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline void kmap_flush_tlb(unsigned long addr) { }
 #endif
 
 void *kmap_high(struct page *page);
-void kunmap_high(struct page *page);
+void kunmap_high(const struct page *page);
 void __kmap_flush_unused(void);
 struct page *__kmap_to_page(void *addr);
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static inline void *kmap(struct page *page)
 	return addr;
 }
 
-static inline void kunmap(struct page *page)
+static inline void kunmap(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	might_sleep();
 	if (!PageHighMem(page))
@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ static inline void kmap_flush_unused(void)
 	__kmap_flush_unused();
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_page(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_local_page(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return __kmap_local_page_prot(page, kmap_prot);
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_page_try_from_panic(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_local_page_try_from_panic(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	if (!PageHighMem(page))
 		return page_address(page);
@@ -81,13 +81,15 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_page_try_from_panic(struct page *page)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset)
+static inline void *kmap_local_folio(const struct folio *const folio,
+				     const size_t offset)
 {
-	struct page *page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE);
+	const struct page *page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE);
 	return __kmap_local_page_prot(page, kmap_prot) + offset % PAGE_SIZE;
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_page_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
+static inline void *kmap_local_page_prot(const struct page *const page,
+					 const pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	return __kmap_local_page_prot(page, prot);
 }
@@ -102,7 +104,7 @@ static inline void __kunmap_local(const void *vaddr)
 	kunmap_local_indexed(vaddr);
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
+static inline void *kmap_atomic_prot(const struct page *const page, const pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
 		migrate_disable();
@@ -113,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
 	return __kmap_local_page_prot(page, prot);
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_atomic(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return kmap_atomic_prot(page, kmap_prot);
 }
@@ -173,17 +175,17 @@ static inline void *kmap(struct page *page)
 	return page_address(page);
 }
 
-static inline void kunmap_high(struct page *page) { }
+static inline void kunmap_high(const struct page *const page) { }
 static inline void kmap_flush_unused(void) { }
 
-static inline void kunmap(struct page *page)
+static inline void kunmap(const struct page *const page)
 {
 #ifdef ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP
 	kunmap_flush_on_unmap(page_address(page));
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_page(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_local_page(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return page_address(page);
 }
@@ -193,12 +195,14 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_page_try_from_panic(struct page *page)
 	return page_address(page);
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset)
+static inline void *kmap_local_folio(const struct folio *const folio,
+				     const size_t offset)
 {
 	return folio_address(folio) + offset;
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_local_page_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
+static inline void *kmap_local_page_prot(const struct page *const page,
+					 const pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	return kmap_local_page(page);
 }
@@ -215,7 +219,7 @@ static inline void __kunmap_local(const void *addr)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page)
+static inline void *kmap_atomic(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
 		migrate_disable();
@@ -225,7 +229,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page)
 	return page_address(page);
 }
 
-static inline void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
+static inline void *kmap_atomic_prot(const struct page *const page, const pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	return kmap_atomic(page);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
index 6234f316468c..105cc4c00cc3 100644
--- a/include/linux/highmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void *kmap(struct page *page);
  * Counterpart to kmap(). A NOOP for CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n and for mappings of
  * pages in the low memory area.
  */
-static inline void kunmap(struct page *page);
+static inline void kunmap(const struct page *page);
 
 /**
  * kmap_to_page - Get the page for a kmap'ed address
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static inline void kmap_flush_unused(void);
  * disabling migration in order to keep the virtual address stable across
  * preemption. No caller of kmap_local_page() can rely on this side effect.
  */
-static inline void *kmap_local_page(struct page *page);
+static inline void *kmap_local_page(const struct page *page);
 
 /**
  * kmap_local_folio - Map a page in this folio for temporary usage
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_page(struct page *page);
  * Context: Can be invoked from any context.
  * Return: The virtual address of @offset.
  */
-static inline void *kmap_local_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset);
+static inline void *kmap_local_folio(const struct folio *folio, size_t offset);
 
 /**
  * kmap_atomic - Atomically map a page for temporary usage - Deprecated!
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset);
  * kunmap_atomic(vaddr2);
  * kunmap_atomic(vaddr1);
  */
-static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page);
+static inline void *kmap_atomic(const struct page *page);
 
 /* Highmem related interfaces for management code */
 static inline unsigned long nr_free_highpages(void);
diff --git a/mm/highmem.c b/mm/highmem.c
index ef3189b36cad..93fa505fcb98 100644
--- a/mm/highmem.c
+++ b/mm/highmem.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline int kmap_local_calc_idx(int idx)
 /*
  * Determine color of virtual address where the page should be mapped.
  */
-static inline unsigned int get_pkmap_color(struct page *page)
+static inline unsigned int get_pkmap_color(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmap_high);
  *
  * This can be called from any context.
  */
-void *kmap_high_get(struct page *page)
+void *kmap_high_get(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	unsigned long vaddr, flags;
 
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ void *kmap_high_get(struct page *page)
  * If ARCH_NEEDS_KMAP_HIGH_GET is not defined then this may be called
  * only from user context.
  */
-void kunmap_high(struct page *page)
+void kunmap_high(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	unsigned long vaddr;
 	unsigned long nr;
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static inline void kmap_local_idx_pop(void)
 #endif
 
 #ifndef arch_kmap_local_high_get
-static inline void *arch_kmap_local_high_get(struct page *page)
+static inline void *arch_kmap_local_high_get(const struct page *const page)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ void *__kmap_local_pfn_prot(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kmap_local_pfn_prot);
 
-void *__kmap_local_page_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
+void *__kmap_local_page_prot(const struct page *const page, const pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	void *kmap;
 
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/highmem: " Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01  9:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  2025-09-01  9:54   ` Max Kellermann
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-09-01  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Kellermann
  Cc: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb,
	vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel

NAK.

For whole series:

Nacked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
things work.

Read again the review you've got and comply with it, writing in your own
words.

Also review https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html please.

Lorenzo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Lorenzo Stoakes
@ 2025-09-01  9:54   ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01 10:04     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lorenzo Stoakes
  Cc: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb,
	vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
> things work.

This accusation of yours is NOT:
- Using welcoming and inclusive language
- Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
- Showing empathy towards other community members

This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.

(I'm also still waiting for your reply to
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01  9:54   ` Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01 10:04     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  2025-09-01 10:20       ` Max Kellermann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-09-01 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Kellermann
  Cc: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb,
	vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

+cc CoC.

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
> > things work.
>
> This accusation of yours is NOT:
> - Using welcoming and inclusive language
> - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> - Showing empathy towards other community members
>
> This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.

It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
itnent.

You have had 3 or 4 VERY BUSY maintainers take time to review your series and
you have behaved appallingly in response since.

I and others have been ENORMOUSLY patient in view of your awful behaviour, which
you are continuing, and apparently escalating.

So at this stage I'm not really interested in seeing any further iterations of
this series from you for the parts of mm I maintain.

I suggest you find another part of the kernel to work upon.

>
> (I'm also still waiting for your reply to
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
> )

Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack. It didn't
warrant a response. I was trying to be patient with you and to see if we could
move past that and have a viable series.

You are very clearly in bad faith and looking for a fight - this is not
professional and this is not the place for it.

I have now spent my morning dealing wtih this and I'm done thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:04     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
@ 2025-09-01 10:20       ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lorenzo Stoakes
  Cc: akpm, david, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb,
	vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> +cc CoC.
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
> > > things work.
> >
> > This accusation of yours is NOT:
> > - Using welcoming and inclusive language
> > - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> > - Showing empathy towards other community members
> >
> > This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.
>
> It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
> review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
> itnent.

There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must
be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true
from my perspective.

I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed,
but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree
to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please
don't mix that up.

> >
> > (I'm also still waiting for your reply to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
> > )
>
> Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack.

It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel
that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I
don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm
waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear
things up and resolve the misunderstanding.

It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:20       ` Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
  2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01 10:56           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-09-01 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Kellermann, Lorenzo Stoakes
  Cc: akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux,
	James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor,
	borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz,
	tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack,
	weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes, shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie,
	osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc,
	linux-s390, sparclinux, linux-fsdevel, conduct

On 01.09.25 12:20, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> +cc CoC.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
>>> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
>>>> things work.
>>>
>>> This accusation of yours is NOT:
>>> - Using welcoming and inclusive language
>>> - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
>>> - Showing empathy towards other community members
>>>
>>> This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.
>>
>> It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
>> review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
>> itnent.
> 
> There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must
> be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true
> from my perspective.
> 
> I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed,
> but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree
> to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please
> don't mix that up.
> 
>>>
>>> (I'm also still waiting for your reply to
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
>>> )
>>
>> Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack.
> 
> It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel
> that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I
> don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm
> waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear
> things up and resolve the misunderstanding.
> 
> It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.

Let's all calm down a bit.

Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the 
engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I 
would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).

So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch 
descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can 
drag it over the finishing line.

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01 11:02             ` David Hildenbrand
  2025-09-01 11:05             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  2025-09-01 10:56           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Max Kellermann @ 2025-09-01 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand
  Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd,
	mhocko, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt,
	surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:43 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the
> engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I
> would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).
>
> So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch
> descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can
> drag it over the finishing line.

Thanks David - I do want to finish this, if there is a constructive
path ahead. I know what you want, but I'm not so sure about the
others.

I can swap all verbose patch messages with the one you suggested.
Would everybody agree that David's suggestion was enough text?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
  2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01 10:56           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  2025-09-01 11:06             ` David Hildenbrand
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-09-01 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand
  Cc: Max Kellermann, akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd,
	mhocko, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt,
	surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 12:43:42PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's all calm down a bit.

I am guessing you are not contradicting what I'm saying here but instead
trying to find a solution as to the _series_.

However, and I'm sure you agree - I want to underline my view that treating
people with disrespect should not be tolerated in the kernel.

I don't always feel we emphasise that enough.

>
> Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the
> engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I would
> get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).

Right - absolutely - the entire point of my review was to allow the series
to land so I agree there's something valuable here.

In some subsystems you might be waiting days/weeks for a response. It's
important (for Max) to realise how valuable this is.

I for one have given as much constructive criticism as I could with thhis
aim in mind, as have you and Vlastimil and Mike.

>
> So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch
> descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can drag
> it over the finishing line.

I guess if Max sends a respin that addresses review correctly and in good
faith I'll give it one more try, but Max - please try to have empathy and
respect in your responses.

This is literally all that I ask.

Otherwise am fine with this coming from somebody else.

>
> --
> Cheers
>
> David / dhildenb
>

Thanks, Lorenzo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
@ 2025-09-01 11:02             ` David Hildenbrand
  2025-09-01 11:05             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-09-01 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Kellermann
  Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd,
	mhocko, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt,
	surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On 01.09.25 12:54, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:43 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the
>> engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I
>> would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).
>>
>> So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch
>> descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can
>> drag it over the finishing line.
> 
> Thanks David - I do want to finish this, if there is a constructive
> path ahead. I know what you want, but I'm not so sure about the
> others.

I think we primarily want to briefly explain the what, the why, and why it is okay.

For getter/test functions the "why it is okay" it's trivial -- test function.
Personally, I would not spell out the individual functions in that case, as
long as they logically belong together (like "shmem test functions"
describe what you did in that patch).

For anything beyond that people likely expect a different reasoning.

For example the following change:

-static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *new, struct folio *old)
+static inline void folio_migrate_refs(struct folio *const new,
+				      const struct folio *const old)

Adds two "const" ways of doing things. As a reviewer, seeing something like that
buried in a patch raises questionmarks.

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
  2025-09-01 11:02             ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2025-09-01 11:05             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  2025-09-01 11:15               ` David Hildenbrand
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-09-01 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Kellermann
  Cc: David Hildenbrand, akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd,
	mhocko, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt,
	surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 12:54:40PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:43 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the
> > engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I
> > would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).
> >
> > So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch
> > descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can
> > drag it over the finishing line.
>
> Thanks David - I do want to finish this, if there is a constructive
> path ahead. I know what you want, but I'm not so sure about the
> others.
>
> I can swap all verbose patch messages with the one you suggested.
> Would everybody agree that David's suggestion was enough text?

I'm fine with:

"constify shmem related test functions for improved const-correctness."

In the summary line, but, as I said on review, with a little more detail as
to what you're doing in that specific file underneath.

You don't necessarily have to list every function, but just to give a sense of
_why_ you chose those.

For instance:

	mm: constify shmem related test functions for improved const-correctness

	We select certain test functions which either invoke each other,
	functions that are already const-ified, or no further functions.

	It is therefore relatively trivial to const-ify them, which
	provides a basis for further const-ification further up the call
	stack.


You can re-use this kind of text for each adjusting sensibly as you go and
noting the dependency as you mentioned I think at 6/12?

Just something that clearly expresses what's going on in plain English.

Cheers, Lorenzo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 10:56           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
@ 2025-09-01 11:06             ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-09-01 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lorenzo Stoakes
  Cc: Max Kellermann, akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd,
	mhocko, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt,
	surenb, vishal.moola, linux, James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev,
	gerald.schaefer, hca, gor, borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas,
	dave.hansen, luto, peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris,
	jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack, weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes,
	shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie, osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-s390, sparclinux,
	linux-fsdevel, conduct

On 01.09.25 12:56, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 12:43:42PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's all calm down a bit.
> 
> I am guessing you are not contradicting what I'm saying here but instead
> trying to find a solution as to the _series_.

Of course.

> 
> However, and I'm sure you agree - I want to underline my view that treating
> people with disrespect should not be tolerated in the kernel.

Absolutely.

And just to add some of my personal thought: a good patch description 
makes the life of reviewers easier. Not caring about that can be 
interpreted by reviewers as a sign of not caring about review(ers).

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  2025-09-01 11:05             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
@ 2025-09-01 11:15               ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-09-01 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lorenzo Stoakes, Max Kellermann
  Cc: akpm, axelrasmussen, yuanchu, willy, hughd, mhocko, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, rppt, surenb, vishal.moola, linux,
	James.Bottomley, deller, agordeev, gerald.schaefer, hca, gor,
	borntraeger, svens, davem, andreas, dave.hansen, luto, peterz,
	tglx, mingo, bp, x86, hpa, chris, jcmvbkbc, viro, brauner, jack,
	weixugc, baolin.wang, rientjes, shakeel.butt, thuth, broonie,
	osalvador, jfalempe, mpe, nysal, linux-arm-kernel, linux-parisc,
	linux-s390, sparclinux, linux-fsdevel, conduct

On 01.09.25 13:05, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 12:54:40PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:43 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the
>>> engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I
>>> would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).
>>>
>>> So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch
>>> descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can
>>> drag it over the finishing line.
>>
>> Thanks David - I do want to finish this, if there is a constructive
>> path ahead. I know what you want, but I'm not so sure about the
>> others.
>>
>> I can swap all verbose patch messages with the one you suggested.
>> Would everybody agree that David's suggestion was enough text?
> 
> I'm fine with:
> 
> "constify shmem related test functions for improved const-correctness."
> 
> In the summary line, but, as I said on review, with a little more detail as
> to what you're doing in that specific file underneath.
> 
> You don't necessarily have to list every function, but just to give a sense of
> _why_ you chose those.
> 
> For instance:
> 
> 	mm: constify shmem related test functions for improved const-correctness
> 
> 	We select certain test functions which either invoke each other,
> 	functions that are already const-ified, or no further functions.
> 
> 	It is therefore relatively trivial to const-ify them, which
> 	provides a basis for further const-ification further up the call
> 	stack.

Yes, that covers the what/why/why okay. For me something shorter would 
be acceptable as well in this case (as explained, due to "test 
functions" semantics), but as long as we're not in the AI-slop range of 
text, all good with me.

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-01 11:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-01  9:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/pagemap: " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/mmzone: add const " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] fs: " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/oom_kill: add const to pointer parameter " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/util, s390: add const to pointer parameters " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] parisc: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/util, s390, sparc, x86: add const to arch_pick_mmap_layout() parameter Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/mm_types: add const to pointer parameters for improved const-correctness Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/mm_inline: " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm: " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/highmem: " Max Kellermann
2025-09-01  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-01  9:54   ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-01 10:04     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-01 10:20       ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-01 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 10:54           ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-01 11:02             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 11:05             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-01 11:15               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 10:56           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-01 11:06             ` David Hildenbrand

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).