From: Lance Hartmann ORACLE <lance.hartmann at oracle.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Debugging /sys driver_override affecting driver binding
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 14:42:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00E9253F-838F-44E4-BCEC-69DDA9B7A944@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0576F8C5-AB9F-4F50-BD77-B99EB4AF800A@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4759 bytes --]
Hi Jim,
Comments below:
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Harris, James R <james.r.harris(a)intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lance,
>
> I haven’t seen this problem before. Does this system have multiple NVMe devices, and only one (or a subset) of them has driver_override set?
Correct. However, I’ve been on other systems with the same configuration — not only the same model of NVMe controllers, but also physically in the same slots — and on those did not see this behavior. It’s only on one particular system so far.
>
> I notice that the two examples you gave were both for PCI BDF 40:00.0 – I assume that means this was collected on two different systems?
I’m sorry, that was a typo. For the case where driver_override was null, the BDF was 0000:40:00.0. Then, on that same system, the driver_override was “nvme” for BDF 0000:30:00.0.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci> seems to indicate that something must be writing “nvme” to that file – i.e. it’s not done internally by the kernel. Maybe our setup.sh script should at least check for this – i.e. don’t reset driver_override to (null) but print a warning message if it finds it set to “nvme”.
I agree completely, but so far my find/grep (for strings “override” and "30:00.0”) has failed to locate the source; again, neither below my real rootfs’s /etc nor anywhere on my initramfs. I also checked my kernel cmdline. The mystery continues. Like you, I was also considering modifying the SPDK’s scripts/setup.sh to inspect driver_override and at least put out some kind of message if the contents is not “(null)”.
--
Lance Hartmann
lance.hartmann(a)oracle.com
>
>
> From: SPDK <spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>> on behalf of Lance Hartmann ORACLE <lance.hartmann(a)oracle.com <mailto:lance.hartmann(a)oracle.com>>
> Reply-To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
> Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 at 10:17 AM
> To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
> Subject: [SPDK] Debugging /sys driver_override affecting driver binding
>
>
> During my experimentation of unbinding NVMe controllers from the Linux nvme driver and then binding them to vfio-pci for use with SPDK, I encountered unusual behavior with one of the controllers. For some, initially inexplicable, reason, one of the NVMe controllers did get unbound as desired from the nvme driver, but it refused to bind to vfio-pci, whereas all the other NVMe controllers had no trouble at all binding to vfio-pci. Inspection of the kernel log (dmesg) didn’t help. And so after a bunch of debugging I uncovered the culprit: the /sys driver attribute, driver_override. By default, all of my NVMe controller’s appeared to have that attribute empty/null, e.g.:
>
>> # cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:40:00.0/driver_override
>> (null)
>
> However, I discovered that for the NVMe controller that refused to bind to vfio-pci, its driver_override attribute contained the string “nvme”:
>
>> # cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:40:00.0/driver_override
>> nvme
>
> Per Linux kernel documentation, ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci:
>
>> This file allows the driver for a device to be specified which
>> will override standard static and dynamic ID matching. When
>> specified, only a driver with a name matching the value written
>> to driver_override will have an opportunity to bind to the
>> device.
>> …
>
> Eureka! So, that explains why I had a particular NVMe device that refused to bind to vfio-pci. I wanted to share this discovery with other folks in case that run into a similar issue. Now, the mystery that remains: how and why did this particular NVMe controller get its driver_override attribute set to “nvme”? It’s not being used as boot device, I’ve never attempted to use it with LVM (Linux Logical Volume Management), nor built any file systems on it, or any such thing. I grep’d through both my real rootfs’s/etc and searched through my initramfs as well, but I’ve yet to discover what’s responsible for setting that particular NVMe controller’s driver_override. Anyone have some ideas?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Lance Hartmann
> lance.hartmann(a)oracle.com <mailto:lance.hartmann(a)oracle.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SPDK mailing list
> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 22562 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 19:42 Lance Hartmann ORACLE [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-03 22:35 [SPDK] Debugging /sys driver_override affecting driver binding Lance Hartmann ORACLE
2018-07-02 20:57 Harris, James R
2018-07-02 16:54 Harris, James R
2018-06-26 17:17 Lance Hartmann ORACLE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00E9253F-838F-44E4-BCEC-69DDA9B7A944@oracle.com \
--to=spdk@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox