From: Harris, James R <james.r.harris at intel.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Number of NVMe devices per core
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:35:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <043AE4C0-FAF0-44BD-B0CA-E586C50E835B@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAHK_hpJasOteNT9x413+Jnrm2G0gcpFEQ0+RGbL0NJ=5DhA2ow@mail.gmail.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6025 bytes --]
Can you confirm you aren’t using a debug build? ‘cat CONFIG.local’ will confirm.
-Jim
From: SPDK <spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org> on behalf of Ernest Zed <kreuzerkrieg(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org>
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 8:26 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Number of NVMe devices per core
Dual socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz, HT off
8 x Intel® SSD DC P3700 Series
16 x 16 DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz
Ubuntu 17.10
4.13.0-32-generic
SPDK version - cloned today
The hardware quite close to the one in the presentation. now results I get with perf for 1, 2 and 4 cores
Starting DPDK 17.11.0 initialization...
[ DPDK EAL parameters: perf -c 0x1 --file-prefix=spdk_pid3180 ]
Device Information : IOPS MB/s Average min max
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002L800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4951.17 1088.65 28467.64
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002S800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4951.71 4392.74 25127.60
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001U800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4952.46 4379.57 21966.62
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002K800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4953.35 4379.25 23165.75
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710002800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4954.31 4357.84 30302.48
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001L800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4955.33 4366.51 37664.17
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002H800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4956.35 4357.68 45025.49
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710015800HGN ) from core 0: 206803.20 807.83 4957.39 3205.82 52456.83
========================================================
Total : 1654425.60 6462.60 4954.01 1088.65 52456.83
Starting DPDK 17.11.0 initialization...
[ DPDK EAL parameters: perf -c 3 --file-prefix=spdk_pid3192 ]
Device Information : IOPS MB/s Average min max
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002S800HGN ) from core 1: 438592.00 1713.25 2334.48 1363.58 16128.43
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002K800HGN ) from core 1: 438592.00 1713.25 2335.47 2073.78 14921.21
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001L800HGN ) from core 1: 438592.00 1713.25 2336.68 2038.52 29808.68
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710015800HGN ) from core 1: 438592.00 1713.25 2337.99 1827.81 44872.18
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002L800HGN ) from core 0: 437977.60 1710.85 2337.78 1409.41 15688.80
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001U800HGN ) from core 0: 437977.60 1710.85 2338.77 2034.40 14879.24
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710002800HGN ) from core 0: 437977.60 1710.85 2339.98 2037.44 29795.93
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002H800HGN ) from core 0: 437977.60 1710.85 2341.29 2037.46 44764.63
========================================================
Total : 3506278.40 13696.40 2337.80 1363.58 44872.18
Starting DPDK 17.11.0 initialization...
[ DPDK EAL parameters: perf -c F --file-prefix=spdk_pid3205 ]
Device Information : IOPS MB/s Average min max
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002K800HGN ) from core 3: 614814.65 2401.62 1665.48 827.93 13076.89
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710015800HGN ) from core 3: 481525.05 1880.96 2128.57 1085.12 37295.10
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001U800HGN ) from core 2: 542172.10 2117.86 1888.83 920.16 19435.55
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002H800HGN ) from core 2: 488315.25 1907.48 2099.24 1070.72 42946.29
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002S800HGN ) from core 1: 585409.45 2286.76 1749.10 897.17 10901.34
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471001L800HGN ) from core 1: 488748.90 1909.18 2097.28 1126.79 43355.29
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT5471002L800HGN ) from core 0: 742426.50 2900.10 1379.04 706.27 10713.54
INTEL SSDPE2MD800G4 (CVFT54710002800HGN ) from core 0: 488740.80 1909.14 2096.44 1136.78 31606.15
========================================================
Total : 4432152.70 17313.10 1849.11 706.27 43355.29
Any idea what possibly could go wrong here?
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Harris, James R <james.r.harris(a)intel.com<mailto:james.r.harris(a)intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Ernest,
The answer depends on many different factors – the IOPs limit per device, CPU core frequency, Turbo, etc. As a frame of reference, the team here at Intel has measured over 3M IO/s on a single Intel Xeon core[1].
-Jim
[1] https://www.flashmemorysummit.com/English/Collaterals/Proceedings/2016/20160809_FA12_P3_Prepalli.pdf - slide 63
From: SPDK <spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org<mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>> on behalf of Ernest Zed <kreuzerkrieg(a)gmail.com<mailto:kreuzerkrieg(a)gmail.com>>
Reply-To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org<mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 6:46 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org<mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
Subject: [SPDK] Number of NVMe devices per core
Hi All,
I ran 'perf' with different settings to see how to get most of NVMe disks. I see that performance degrades once cpu mask puts more than 2 devises per core. Is it OK? what is the theoretical (or empirical) limit of devices one core can handle?
Sincerely,
Ernest
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org<mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 18671 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 15:35 Harris, James R [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-18 12:24 [SPDK] Number of NVMe devices per core Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 18:24 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 18:22 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 17:55 Verma, Vishal4
2018-02-15 17:52 Verkamp, Daniel
2018-02-15 17:42 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 16:54 Verma, Vishal4
2018-02-15 16:45 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 16:17 Verma, Vishal4
2018-02-15 15:51 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 15:26 Ernest Zed
2018-02-15 14:50 Harris, James R
2018-02-15 13:46 Ernest Zed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=043AE4C0-FAF0-44BD-B0CA-E586C50E835B@intel.com \
--to=spdk@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox