From: Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker at intel.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] SPDK + user space appliance
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:28:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516382916.25907.15.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: AM5PR04MB307489E0EB9C162E7F761E3D89150@AM5PR04MB3074.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]
On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 09:09 +0000, Shahar Salzman wrote:
> We have been integrating spdk into our system using a blockdev module,
> currently only a POC version.
> Our use case is a user space appliance processing IOs, with an SPDK frontend
> to do the NVMeF.
>
> Currently all of the user bdevs are created via configuration file, but we are
> working to add functions + rpc's which allow creation/deletion of these
> namespaces.
Ok - so you have our NVMe-oF target in front and it routes I/Os to your system
via a custom bdev module that you wrote. This is exactly how we intended for you
to use it, so it looks good to me.
> IO is sent to user space via callback, implementation is up to user space, but
> obviously the longer it lingers there the lower the performance, we use a set
> of rings + threads processing them, so that the time spent in the appliance is
> minimal.
> Going back from user space we use a single ring (multiple producers single
> consumer) onto which the completions are inserted, and the ring poll function
> is registered with spdk core (spdk_poller_register).
What do you mean by I/O is sent to user space via callback? When was the I/O
ever in kernel space? Is your storage system running in the kernel?
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-19 17:28 Walker, Benjamin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-16 22:58 [SPDK] SPDK + user space appliance
2018-07-12 14:34 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-13 8:46 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-11 13:11
2018-05-10 13:33 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-10 7:36
2018-05-10 6:34
2018-05-09 19:45 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-09 16:52 Walker, Benjamin
2018-05-09 11:57 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-09 9:54
2018-05-09 8:43
2018-05-09 7:48 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-08 17:30 Walker, Benjamin
2018-05-08 7:36 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-07 18:18 Harris, James R
2018-05-07 18:02 Walker, Benjamin
2018-05-06 10:32 Shahar Salzman
2018-05-03 17:50 Verkamp, Daniel
2018-05-03 8:00 Shahar Salzman
2018-04-25 6:02 Shahar Salzman
2018-04-24 16:19 Walker, Benjamin
2018-04-23 15:44 Shahar Salzman
2018-02-02 21:43 Walker, Benjamin
2018-02-01 8:29 Shahar Salzman
2018-01-31 16:48 Walker, Benjamin
2018-01-31 16:40 Walker, Benjamin
2018-01-25 14:19 Shahar Salzman
2018-01-23 8:21 Ilan Steinberg
2018-01-23 8:20 Ilan Steinberg
2018-01-19 17:48 Walker, Benjamin
2018-01-19 17:38 Aneesh Pachilangottil
2018-01-18 23:53 Chang, Cunyin
2018-01-14 9:09 Shahar Salzman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516382916.25907.15.camel@intel.com \
--to=spdk@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox