On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 13:40 +0000, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
> So how do we move this forward? Should I submit a patch based on the below
> approach, or just remove claimed check (and, presumably, leave bdev_open
> interface as is so that the caller can still limit access to read-only if
> desired)?

My vote (and Jim's) is to remove the check in spdk_bdev_claim. Don't change any
of the public APIs. If you submit a patch for this, we'll review and merge.