From: Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker at intel.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Rocksdb test case issue
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 22:25:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528323925.5846.55.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: F1151624ABEE794C8A34A4CA571EEAA8509E72@BGSMSX105.gar.corp.intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1523 bytes --]
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 08:59 +0000, Sablok, Kunal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Module init and exit functions have a requirement to be asynchronous in
> nature where module init needs to initialize some data structures per core, so
> it uses spdk_for_each_thread() call for this purpose.
> * In module init(), spdk_for_each_thread() is used and it executes one
> function which initializes some data structures on that core. When init on all
> cores is done, callback is called, then it calls spdk_bdev_module_init_done()
> to notify module init is done. Similar things are there in module exit
> function, where it uses spdk_for_each_thread() to deallocate some data
> structures per core and when all cores are done processing later callback
> function calls spdk_bdev_module_finish_done(). This is what
> spdk_for_each_thread() behavior.
The root of the problem here is that you have a global array, indexed by the
core number. Instead of storing data structures per core, you should be
leveraging SPDK's I/O channel functionality. Some background information is
available at http://www.spdk.io/doc/concurrency.html.
Specifically, inside pvol_bdev_create_cb you should be allocating a new
pvol_bdev_io_waitq data structure and stuffing it into the channel. Similarly in
pvol_bdev_destroy_cb you should be releasing it. Then, on start up and shutdown,
instead of using spdk_for_each_thread, call spdk_for_each_channel. With that
design, threads will be able to come and go as needed.
Thanks,
Ben
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 22:25 Walker, Benjamin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-15 9:47 [SPDK] Rocksdb test case issue Sablok, Kunal
2018-06-15 1:09 Harris, James R
2018-06-11 23:46 Harris, James R
2018-06-11 15:30 Sablok, Kunal
2018-06-08 16:41 Walker, Benjamin
2018-06-06 23:16 Sablok, Kunal
2018-06-05 8:59 Sablok, Kunal
2018-06-01 7:24 Sablok, Kunal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1528323925.5846.55.camel@intel.com \
--to=spdk@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox