Storage Performance Development Kit (SPDK)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Read request exceeding max_hw_sectors_kb
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:47:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180613114756.GA27631@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0ba3cccb9d2ee7cba50a91bfc92b373a@mail.gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 748 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:11:56PM +0530, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
> So something like resolves the issue:
> static void nvme_set_chunk_size(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> {
> 	u32 chunk_size = (((u32)ns->noiob) << (ns->lba_shift - 9));
> 
> 	chunk_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(chunk_size);
> 	chunk_size = min(ns->ctrl->max_hw_sectors, chunk_size);
> 	blk_queue_chunk_sectors(ns->queue,
> rounddown_pow_of_two(chunk_size));
> }
> 
> Please do let me know if this is the right approach or SPDK should set
> noiob appropriately.

I think the answer is both:  The kernel code should be more robust
in handling bogus noiob sizes, so please submit a patch per your above
analysis.  spdk should be fixed to not expose a bogus noiob size as well.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-13 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-13 11:47 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-27 10:28 [SPDK] Read request exceeding max_hw_sectors_kb Jitendra Bhivare
2018-06-26 15:07 Keith Busch
2018-06-26 10:47 Jitendra Bhivare
2018-06-15 13:58 Jitendra Bhivare
2018-06-14 14:54 Keith Busch
2018-06-14 10:16 Jitendra Bhivare
2018-06-13 17:00 Daniel Verkamp
2018-06-13 10:41 Jitendra Bhivare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180613114756.GA27631@lst.de \
    --to=spdk@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox