Storage Performance Development Kit (SPDK)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] SPDK & DPDK in one process
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:53:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3132089.uuuRJKvomT@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1477351848.71904.43.camel@intel.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2023 bytes --]

Hi SPDK

2016-10-24 23:30, Walker, Benjamin:
> On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 21:19 +0300, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> > Hello
> > 
> > I need to run DPDK networking and access NVMe device in the same process.
> > 
> > rte_eal_init() initializes network PMD drivers normally
> > But spdk_nvme_probe() activates network devices probe for the second time and
> > rte exits with error.
> > 
> > To resolve this failure I register NVMe controller driver as DPDK PMD.
> > Now I can pass NVMe device PCI address to EAL initialization with `-w'
> > parameter along with network devices
> > PMD template I use is attached below.
> > 
> > Is there another way to run DPDK and SPDK in the same process ? 
> 
> You found the best way right now, but I'm working with the DPDK community to
> improve here. It seems like the rte_pci module doesn't handle multiple calls to
> rte_eal_pci_probe, which is what SPDK is doing. The most important change to
> DPDK that needs to happen is that rte_eal_pci_probe needs to not call the driver
> initialization function for devices that already have a driver loaded. That's a
> very easy fix that solves your problem and I'll be submitting a patch to the
> DPDK community.
> 
> Longer term I think we really need to work with DPDK to clean up some of these
> PCI interfaces so they're more dynamic and can handle devices and drivers coming
> and going at run time.

Yes you are welcome to contribute to DPDK.

There is a slow work in progress to better design the EAL in order to ease
integration of new buses and allow true hotplugging.
We do these core changes step by step:

After having better designed the device object, we are changing the bus model.
Instead of having PCI the default bus, and vdev an exception, we need a
generic bus object to plug PCI, vdev and other buses in it.
Then we should design a better app event mechanism, usable for hotplug.
Another step could be an auto-binding.
And at the end we could be plugged to hardware events like udev.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-25 20:53 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-26 17:03 [SPDK] SPDK & DPDK in one process Gregory Etelson
2016-10-24 23:30 Walker, Benjamin
2016-10-22 18:19 Gregory Etelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3132089.uuuRJKvomT@xps13 \
    --to=spdk@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox