From: Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel <krath at cloudsimple.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] BDEV Registration
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:55:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C1AF6F13-0804-4E7D-9FF0-39AB58EFFA0F@cloudsimple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: FA84B8EF-0BD9-40E1-B899-390895C7464D@cloudsimple.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10352 bytes --]
Hi Everyone ,
Got the issue resolved by increasing the number huge pages.
Thanks for your Support will definitely need in future too.
Thanking You,
Param
> On 21-Oct-2016, at 12:23 PM, Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel <krath(a)cloudsimple.com> wrote:
>
> These config lines were commented. I just enabled it. It fails even after that. Is it because of this error No free hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB
>
> Thanking You,
> Param
>
> On 21-Oct-2016, at 12:11 PM, Yang, Ziye <ziye.yang(a)intel.com <mailto:ziye.yang(a)intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Do you have set malloc module in your configuration file? You need have the malloc configuration such as
>>
>> [Malloc]
>> NumberOfLuns 4
>> LunSizeInMB 64
>>
>> <>
>> From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>] On Behalf Of Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 2:37 PM
>> To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [SPDK] BDEV Registration
>>
>> My platform does not have RNIC but the bdev should get initialised right. Does it have any dependency on this transport type. Irrespective of this bdevs should get added right.
>>
>> Thanking You,
>> Param
>> On 21-Oct-2016, at 11:59 AM, Yang, Ziye <ziye.yang(a)intel.com <mailto:ziye.yang(a)intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Virtual controller is supported. From your output, it seems that you did not compile with RDMA, does your platform have RNIC?
>>
>> “conf.c: 420:spdk_nvmf_parse_subsystem: ***ERROR*** Unknown transport type 'RDMA'
>> ”
>>
>> From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>] On Behalf Of Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 2:27 PM
>> To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [SPDK] BDEV Registration
>>
>> Is Virtual controller not supported in the current NVMe/F target implementation. Because in configuration file it is written as only direct mode is currently supported. This is the output generated. and my config file.
>>
>> Starting Intel(R) DPDK initialization ...
>> [ DPDK EAL parameters: nvmf -c 1 -n 4 -m 2048 --master-lcore=0 --file-prefix=rte0 --proc-type=auto ]
>> EAL: Detected 4 lcore(s)
>> EAL: Auto-detected process type: PRIMARY
>> EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB
>> EAL: Probing VFIO support...
>> done.
>> Occupied cpu core mask is 0x1
>> Occupied cpu socket mask is 0x1
>> copy_engine_ioat.c: 288:copy_engine_ioat_init: ***ERROR*** Not enough IOAT channels for all cores
>> Total cores available: 1
>> Reactor started on core 0x0
>>
>> *** NVMf Pool Creation ***
>> conf.c: 420:spdk_nvmf_parse_subsystem: ***ERROR*** Unknown transport type 'RDMA'
>> conf.c: 516:spdk_nvmf_parse_subsystem: ***ERROR*** bdev is NULL
>> nvmf_tgt.c: 254:spdk_nvmf_startup: ***ERROR*** spdk_nvmf_parse_conf() failed
>>
>> The subystem part of the config file
>> [Subsystem1]
>> NQN nqn.2016-06.io.spdk:cnode2
>> Core 0
>> Mode Virtual
>> Listen RDMA 192.168.2.21:4420
>> Host nqn.2016-06.io.spdk:init
>> SN SPDK00000000000001
>> Namespace Malloc0
>> Namespace Malloc1
>>
>> Thanking You,
>> Param.
>> On 21-Oct-2016, at 11:43 AM, Yang, Ziye <ziye.yang(a)intel.com <mailto:ziye.yang(a)intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> #define SPDK_SUBSYSTEM_REGISTER(_name, _init, _fini, _config) \
>> struct spdk_subsystem __spdk_subsystem_ ## _name = { \
>> .name = #_name, \
>> .init = _init, \
>> .fini = _fini, \
>> .config = _config, \
>> }; \
>> __attribute__((constructor)) static void _name ## _register(void) \
>> { \
>> spdk_add_subsystem(&__spdk_subsystem_ ## _name); \
>> }
>>
>> The attribute is constructor, so the function will be directly called before the execution of main. I think that for your case, you just need to change the configuration file.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>] On Behalf Of Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 2:09 PM
>> To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [SPDK] BDEV Registration
>>
>> Thanks for the update.
>>
>> I am still not clear who should call the function SPDK_SUBSYSTEM_REGISTER. I just wanted to add virtual mode subsystem as the NVMe/F target. In configuration the Virtual has two Malloc drives. So even before the main function I should create these devices and add. I find SPDK_SUBSYSTEM_REGISTER in lib/bdev/malloc/blocdev_malloc.c . So who should call this function? Should I call it by writing a separate program.
>>
>> Thanking You,
>> Param
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Param,
>>
>> In the iscsi_tgt's main:
>>
>> spdk_app_init -> spdk_subsystem_init -> subsystem->init()
>>
>> (bdev is also a subsystem: registered with SPDK_SUBSYSTEM_REGISTER(bdev, spdk_bdev_initialize, spdk_bdev_finish, spdk_bdev_config_text))
>>
>> SPDK_SUBSYSTEM_REGISTER in bdev will be executed before main, and add the bdev subsystem.
>>
>> It will finally call spdk_bdev_initialize -> spdk_bdev_module_initialize -> call module_init.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Ziye Yang
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org>] On Behalf Of
>> Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:09 PM
>> To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org <mailto:spdk(a)lists.01.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [SPDK] BDEV Registration
>>
>> Thanks Daniel.
>>
>> When will the bdev subsystem get initialised? Which part of the code handles the bdev subsystem initialisation.
>>
>> Thanking You,
>> Param
>>
>>
>> On 21-Oct-2016, at 3:29 AM, Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp(a)intel.com <mailto:daniel.verkamp(a)intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 01:11 PM, Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have just started using SPDK. I am in need to implement a NVMe/F target implementation using SPDK. I need to use the Virtual Subsystem. I see that there is support for RAM disks and I am using it as reference to my Virtual implementation .
>>
>> There is a function called SPDK_BDEV_MODULE_REGISTER in the file lib/bdev/malloc/blockdev_malloc.c.
>>
>> How is this function getting called? Who calls this function
>>
>> Regards
>> Param
>>
>> Hi Param,
>>
>> You can find the interface for writing new bdev modules in the header
>> lib/bdev/bdev_module.h - this is where SPDK_BDEV_MODULE_REGISTER() is defined. This macro creates a constructor function that adds your bdev module's function pointer table (defined using a spdk_bdev_module_if) to a global list.
>>
>> Later, when the bdev subsystem is initialized, each bdev module will have its module_init function called, where it should create its bdevs and register them using spdk_bdev_register(). Currently, all of the bdevs in SPDK use our configuration file library to read from a common conf file when determining which bdevs are created and what options to use (e.g. the malloc bdev uses the [Malloc] section of the configuration file).
>>
>> When registering a bdev, you must provide another set of function pointers in fn_table which perform operations on the individual bdevs, like creating a new I/O channel and submitting I/O requests on a channel.
>>
>> To hook up your bdev module in the NVMe over Fabrics target, you will also want to modify mk/spdk.modules.mk to add your new module to the BLOCKDEV_MODULES list. This adds linker options to all of the applications in the SPDK tree that use bdev modules.
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any further questions - the bdev module API is still somewhat in flux and not well documented.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SPDK mailing list
>> SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 42255 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 7:25 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-21 6:53 [SPDK] BDEV Registration Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
2016-10-21 6:41 Yang, Ziye
2016-10-21 6:36 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
2016-10-21 6:29 Yang, Ziye
2016-10-21 6:27 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
2016-10-21 6:13 Yang, Ziye
2016-10-21 6:09 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
2016-10-21 5:31 Yang, Ziye
2016-10-21 4:09 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
2016-10-20 21:59 Daniel Verkamp
2016-10-20 20:11 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C1AF6F13-0804-4E7D-9FF0-39AB58EFFA0F@cloudsimple.com \
--to=spdk@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox