From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6390524606618239543=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Luse, Paul E <paul.e.luse at intel.com>
Subject: [SPDK] Re: SPDK RAID5 support
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:31:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D3D23831-BCDC-4548-B756-AAD1EDE712C7@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: d72c2d61-32b4-95a9-99c6-6d58c9c80a69@intel.com
List-ID: <spdk@lists.01.org>
To: spdk@lists.01.org

--===============6390524606618239543==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Agreed.  And to save on emails, Artur wrt your response to my email - aweso=
me! And wrt DDF yeah I meant "strict adherence to" - totally agree there's =
a lot to borrow there if nothing else than to make sure we're covering all =
of our bases.  Looking forward to seeing this get started and I'm definitel=
y going to grab an item or two of the backlog (

Thx
Paul

=EF=BB=BFOn 10/4/19, 6:39 AM, "Artur Paszkiewicz" <artur.paszkiewicz(a)inte=
l.com> wrote:

    On 10/4/19 12:49 AM, =E6=9D=BE=E6=9C=AC=E5=91=A8=E5=B9=B3 / MATSUMOTO=
=EF=BC=8CSHUUHEI wrote:
    > Recently SPDK are starting to support DIF feature.
    > Can we have any possibility to include the extended LBA (block size =
=3D 512 + 8, 4096 + 128, or etc) into SPDK RAID?
    =

    Do you mean DIF passthrough? I think this should be included.
    =

    Thanks,
    Artur
    _______________________________________________
    SPDK mailing list -- spdk(a)lists.01.org
    To unsubscribe send an email to spdk-leave(a)lists.01.org
    =



--===============6390524606618239543==--