From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8485888699625573667==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Harris, James R Subject: Re: [SPDK] SPDK availability in vcpkg Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:11:13 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: CAHK_hpLR_6oaNS-LA04iU+mXK1skuNyTZ+opi6ahz7fDvpixuQ@mail.gmail.com List-ID: To: spdk@lists.01.org --===============8485888699625573667== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Ernest. Sorry for the delay in replying - between last week's SPDK = summit and our upcoming 19.04 release I've gotten behind on e-mail replies. vcpkg looks interesting but I'll admit I'm not really familiar with it. Wo= uld this be an alternative to running the pkgdep.sh script in SPDK to prepa= re a system for building and running SPDK? -Jim =EF=BB=BFOn 4/16/19, 11:12 AM, "SPDK on behalf of Ernest Zed" wrote: Recently I've created ports for all SPDK dependencies (DPDK, isa-l, ips= ec) for vcpkg package manager. In short, vcpkg is a curated (by Microsoft) = tool and infrastructure to manage consumption of C/C++ libraries by develope= rs all over the world, it is open source and cross platform (MS/Linux/MacO= S). More on vcpkg here https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg A couple of weeks ago, I finally moved to creating SPDK port for vcpkg. Looks like it is doing well and it is close to be merged into `master`. I want to encourage you to visit the PR page on GitHub https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg/pull/5877 and give your opinion. Wha= t do you think? Is it a good thing for SPDK community? will it make develope= r's life easier? If you think it is worth the effort, do you think there is things to improve? Looking forward to hearing from you. _______________________________________________ SPDK mailing list SPDK(a)lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk = --===============8485888699625573667==--