Storage Performance Development Kit (SPDK)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz <dariusz.stojaczyk at intel.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: [SPDK] A few thoughts about spdk_top
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:29:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b320b3f1175344e297098ce1bf27350a@intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1280 bytes --]

I like the idea of spdk_top application, although I'm slightly concerned about our implementation. Is it a right choice to develop it in C? It's already a huge amount of code and it already has a huge amount of limitations, not even mentioning possible bugs. I actually spent a lot of time developing in curses, GTK, GTKmm and even WinAPI and I don't do it anymore because it's difficult and not worth it. I switched to javascript as well as server-side javascript for my other projects and I find it incredibly easier to write user apps there. I'm not trying to push on javascript specifically, but could we consider writing spdk_top in a higher level language, where we don't care about memory allocation, json parsing, and printing data to the screen?

Currently spdk_top seems to require the same, detailed review as any spdk patch and honestly I'm a bit reluctant to review it. Moreover, I find one major feature missing there - a view with all pollers on a specific, single thread and busy time % for each poller, so that I can see what my thread is most busy with. I think it would be the first view I check when doing any spdk optimization. Yet I see it's quite a bit of effort to add it to the current spdk_top code, which brings me back to my first question.

D.


                 reply	other threads:[~2020-04-07 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b320b3f1175344e297098ce1bf27350a@intel.com \
    --to=spdk@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox