stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
To: "'Felipe Balbi'" <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
	"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix bit definitions for LNKCAP2 register
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:18:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001d42e7b$07990170$16cb0450$@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lg9ia8q6.fsf@linux.intel.com>

On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 4:21 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:51:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Even thhough commit b891b4dc1eed claimed that original bit definitions
> >> were wrong, that's not really the case. After verifying PCI
> >> Specification Revisions 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0, Link Capabilites 2
> >> Register's bit definitions were always starting from Bit 0.
> >>
> >> This has been causing issues reporting correct link speeds on sysfs.
> >
> > Can you elaborate on this a bit?  b891b4dc1eed still looks correct to
> > me.  I'm looking at PCIe r4.0, sec 7.5.3.18, where it shows:
> >
> >   bit    0  RsvdP
> >   bits 7:1  Supported Link Speeds Vector
> 
> I had missed this detail, actually. It was a misinterpretation of the
> spec. Sorry for the noise.

Hi Balbi,

I can understand your situation. The detail of PCIe spec is very confusing.
Actually, I was one of those who misunderstood. However, after reviewing
the PCIe spec carefully, I found that the bit definition was wrong. At that
time,
I already checked that my patch works properly with Exynos SoCs. Thank you.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> --
> balbi

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-07 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03  6:51 [PATCH] PCI: Fix bit definitions for LNKCAP2 register Felipe Balbi
2018-08-06 18:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-07  8:20   ` Felipe Balbi
2018-08-07 18:18     ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2018-08-07 20:13     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-08  6:30       ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000001d42e7b$07990170$16cb0450$@gmail.com' \
    --to=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).