Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
To: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>,
	Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: pci_call_probe: call local_pci_probe() when selected cpu is offline
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:09:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0052b62b-aafe-e2eb-6d66-4ad0178bdae1@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670927f1-42d8-40bc-bd79-55e178bd907a@linux.intel.com>

Hi Ethan,

On 2024/7/24 上午10:47, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> On 7/24/2024 9:58 AM, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
>> Hi Ethan,
>> On 2024/7/22 PM 3:39, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/13/2024 3:42 PM, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
>>>> Call work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg) in pci_call_probe() while the argument
>>>> @cpu is a offline cpu would cause system stuck forever.
>>>>
>>>> This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are
>>>> offline (We can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it).
>>>>
>>>> So, in the above case, let pci_call_probe() call local_pci_probe()
>>>> instead of work_on_cpu() when the best selected cpu is offline.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 69a18b18699b ("PCI: Restrict probe functions to housekeeping 
>>>> CPUs")
>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2 -> v3: Modify commit message according to Markus's suggestion
>>>> v1 -> v2: Add a method to reproduce the problem
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> index af2996d0d17f..32a99828e6a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver 
>>>> *drv, struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>>           free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask);
>>>>       }
>>>> -    if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
>>>
>>> Why not choose the right cpu to callwork_on_cpu() ? the one that is 
>>> online. Thanks, Ethan
>> Yes, let housekeeping_cpumask() return online cpu is a good idea, but 
>> it may be changed by command line. so the simplest way is to call 
>> local_pci_probe when the best selected cpu is offline.
> 
> Hmm..... housekeeping_cpumask() should never return offline CPU, so
> I guess you didn't hit issue with the CPU isolation, but the following
> code seems not good.
The issue is the dev node is online but the best selected cpu is 
offline, so it seems that there is no better way to directly set the cpu 
to nr_cpu_ids.
> 
> ...
> 
> if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node) ||
>          pci_physfn_is_probed(dev)) {
>          cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
>      } else {
> 
> ....
> 
> perhaps you could change the logic there and fix it  ?
> 
> Thanks
> Ethan
> 
> 
> 
>>>
>>>> +    if ((cpu < nr_cpu_ids) && cpu_online(cpu))
>>>>           error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
>>>>       else
>>>>           error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
>>
>>


-- 
Best Regards
Hongchen Zhang


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-24  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13  7:42 [PATCH v3] PCI: pci_call_probe: call local_pci_probe() when selected cpu is offline Hongchen Zhang
2024-07-22  2:11 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-22  7:39 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24  1:58   ` Hongchen Zhang
2024-07-24  2:47     ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24  3:09       ` Hongchen Zhang [this message]
2024-07-24  6:40         ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24  7:05           ` Hongchen Zhang
2024-09-13  8:06             ` Huacai Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0052b62b-aafe-e2eb-6d66-4ad0178bdae1@loongson.cn \
    --to=zhanghongchen@loongson.cn \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=abelits@marvell.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox