RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] ufs: core: set SDEV_OFFLINE when ufs shutdown.

["Kiwoong Kim" <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>]

> > > On 9/23/24 7:17 PM, Seunghwan Baek wrote:> That's because SSU (Start
> > > Stop
> > > Unit) command must be sent during
> > > > shutdown process. If SDEV_OFFLINE is set for wlun, SSU command
> > > > cannot be sent because it is rejected by the scsi layer.
> > > > Therefore, we consider to set SDEV_QUIESCE for wlun, and set
> > > > SDEV_OFFLINE for other lus.
> > > Right. Since ufshcd_wl_shutdown() is expected to stop all DMA
> > > related to the UFS host, shouldn't there be a
> > > scsi_device_quiesce(sdev) call after the __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba,
> UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM) call?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bart.
> >
> > Yes. __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM) should be called after
> > scsi_device_quiesce(sdev). Generally, the SSU command is the last
> > command before UFS power off. Therefore, if __ufshcd_wl_suspend is
> > performed before scsi_device_quiesce, other commands may be performed
> > after the SSU command and UFS may not guarantee the operation of the
> > SSU command, which may cause other problems. This order must be
> guaranteed.
> >
> > And with SDEV_QUIESCE, deadlock issue cannot be avoided due to requeue.
> > We need to return the i/o error with SDEV_OFFLINE to avoid the
> > mentioned deadlock problem.
> 
> (+ more CC added.)
> Dear All.
> 
> Could you please update for this patch?
> If you have any opinions about this patch, share and comment it.
> 
> Thanks.
> BRs.

Looks good to me.

Thanks.
Kiwoong Kim.