From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: "Raphaël Halimi" <raphael.halimi@gmail.com>,
"Linux Stable Mailing List" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Regressions Mailing List <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Input Mailing List <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
Mikhail Khvainitski <me@khvoinitsky.org>
Subject: Re: Regression with Lenovo ThinkPad Compact USB Keyboard
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:08:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10022b0c-89c3-43e1-89ba-00e458fe1dfd@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a5fc584-1520-4e52-9c77-d67a656524c6@gmail.com>
On 24.02.24 11:52, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Le 20/02/2024 à 19:12, Raphaël Halimi a écrit :
>> I'll let a few days pass (remember, the bug doesn't happen immediately
>> but only after a varying amount of time) and I'll report here if the
>> spurious middle-clicks happened again or not.
>
> As promised, here's my report: using the recompiled hid-lenvo module
> without those three patches for more than three days, I didn't
> experience a single spurious middle-click, whereas the in-tree module
> triggered the bug several times a day, and I had to unplug/replug the
> keyboard (or simulate it with a software trick) to get back to a normal
> state.
>
> So those three patches did introduce this regression after all (as I
> correctly guessed).
Mikhail, do you have any idea what might be wrong here? The three
commits Raphaël mentioned that seem to cause the issue are all yours afaics.
Raphaël: would nevertheless still be good if you could identify which of
the three causes the problem, as then the developers might consider
simply reverting it.
Ciao, Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-24 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 11:51 Regression with Lenovo ThinkPad Compact USB Keyboard Raphaël Halimi
2024-02-20 11:35 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-02-20 18:12 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-02-20 19:05 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-02-24 10:52 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-02-24 13:08 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) [this message]
2024-02-24 13:51 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-02-24 16:15 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-03-04 14:33 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-03-04 14:52 ` Mikhail Khvoinitsky
2024-03-04 15:07 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-03-04 15:12 ` Mikhail Khvoinitsky
2024-03-04 16:09 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-03-12 11:56 ` Raphaël Halimi
2024-03-12 13:05 ` Mikhail Khvoinitsky
2024-03-12 13:12 ` Raphaël Halimi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10022b0c-89c3-43e1-89ba-00e458fe1dfd@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@khvoinitsky.org \
--cc=raphael.halimi@gmail.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox