From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED19CA9EAE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD73E2067D for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="V86NcpS6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726575AbfJ2UIm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:08:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:46949 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726535AbfJ2UIm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:08:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572379720; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WVMR/1qX6q2o8+G1jONU+fXGcDMObD5fAQeZ0YhInKg=; b=V86NcpS6Om4RSDNglbICVPXxtM+JTqQYclGymgt9KoP/AQE2PBUm2y+dVNCC5mPG+5TgHA gbqtgf1Jr1x6kIPMQhSO/FHvl0I4hAHV8PLNR3yjHqku5zTvRmjYP3gr61fUOYm1XdSJQN 2s7wf4EM+X7QYdlq2vCmfXKwsbvV5Lw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-112-ZEttjrsGPEKzvwW2uTU6jQ-1; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:08:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4FBA1005500; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-121-15.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206741001B09; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_=e2=9d=8c_FAIL=3a_Test_report_for_kernel_5=2e3=2e8-?= =?UTF-8?Q?rc2-96dab43=2ecki_=28stable=29?= To: Greg KH , Deepa Dinamani Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Naresh Kamboju , Linux Stable maillist , Eryu Guan , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, CKI Project References: <20191029073318.c33ocl76zsgnx2y5@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> <20191029080855.GA512708@kroah.com> <20191029091126.ijvixns6fe3dzte3@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> <20191029092158.GA582092@kroah.com> <20191029124029.yygp2yetcjst4s6p@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> <20191029181223.GB587491@kroah.com> From: Rachel Sibley Message-ID: <114dc6b2-846b-240d-db33-dd67aac51d30@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:08:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191029181223.GB587491@kroah.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-MC-Unique: ZEttjrsGPEKzvwW2uTU6jQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:57:05AM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> The test is expected to fail on all kernels without the series. >> >> The series is a bugfix in the sense that vfs is no longer allowed to >> set timestamps that filesystems have no way of supporting. >> There have been a couple of fixes after the series also. >> >> We can either disable the test or include the series for stable kernels. > I don't see adding this series for the stable kernels, it does not make > sense. I'm not sure what the final decision is here, but I've moved the test to=20 a waived status for now, which means it should stop causing the job to fail. However, you may see=20 a few lingering reports sneak in before I made this change. Once resolved, I'll remove=20 the waived tag. Thanks, Rachel > thanks, > > greg k-h >