From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix memleak on registration failure
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:47:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <117383d0-6bc7-4093-53b8-e90e86c29db7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222105023.6205-1-johan@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 12/22/21 11:50, Johan Hovold wrote:
> In case device registration fails during module initialisation, the
> platform device structure needs to be freed using platform_device_put()
> to properly free all resources (e.g. the device name).
>
> Fixes: 938835aa903a ("platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: do not create a static struct device")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/pltdrv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/pltdrv.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/pltdrv.c
> index 73797680b895..15ca8afdd973 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/pltdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/pltdrv.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int __init pmc_core_platform_init(void)
>
> retval = platform_device_register(pmc_core_device);
> if (retval)
> - kfree(pmc_core_device);
> + platform_device_put(pmc_core_device);
>
> return retval;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 10:50 [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix memleak on registration failure Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 11:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-23 18:47 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-25 10:28 Simon Bursten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=117383d0-6bc7-4093-53b8-e90e86c29db7@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox