Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: Fix an SG_IO regression
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:23:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11a35a46-dc51-c32f-cb64-793d9dd02c53@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171025095617.7315-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>

On 10/25/2017 02:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Avoid that submitting an SG_IO ioctl triggers a kernel oops that
> is preceded by:
> 
> usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to (null) (<null>) (6 bytes)
> kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:72!

Seems I saw a note on a runtime oops triggered by this patch yesterday,
but now I can't seem to find it... Did you see it?

> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> index 4a438b8abe27..b0b2100763bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ config VIRTIO_BLK_SCSI
>  	bool "SCSI passthrough request for the Virtio block driver"
>  	depends on VIRTIO_BLK
>  	select BLK_SCSI_REQUEST
> +	select SCSI_MOD

Should this be SCSI? That's what libata does. It may be correct as-is,
didn't look too deeply, just curious why it's different.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-25  9:56 [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: Fix an SG_IO regression Bart Van Assche
2017-10-25 18:23 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-10-25 19:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-25 19:34     ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-25 19:37       ` hch
2017-10-26  4:33         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-26  4:38           ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-26  4:44       ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11a35a46-dc51-c32f-cb64-793d9dd02c53@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox