From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1342004396.3462.140.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated) From: Peter Zijlstra To: John Stultz Cc: Linux Kernel , Ingo Molnar , Prarit Bhargava , Thomas Gleixner , stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:59:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1341960205-56738-1-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com> References: <1341960205-56738-1-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 18:43 -0400, John Stultz wrote: > Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix > in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make > to improve performance as well as style. > > So this iteration includes his modifications. > > Once merged, I'll be working to get the backports finished as quickly > as I can and sent to -stable. I think we all dislike 1/6, but I can't come up with anything saner either. The rest looks good. The only thing I found (and already mentioned to Thomas) is that the Changelog of 1/6 could be improved by mentioning why we're in hardirq context to begin with. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra