Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	quentin.perret@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	Douglas.Raillard@arm.com, "4 . 20" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:37:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13587320.TAQQ9Zc4eI@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190104110142.GA28483@e107155-lin>

On Friday, January 4, 2019 12:01:42 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:14:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Since the commit 2a4eb7358aba ("OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from
> > _dev_pm_opp_remove_table()"), dynamically created OPP aren't
> > automatically removed anymore by dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(). This
> > affects the scpi and scmi cpufreq drivers which no longer free OPPs on
> > failures or on invocations of the policy->exit() callback.
> >
> > Create a generic OPP helper dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic() which can be
> > called from these drivers instead of dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table().
> >
> > In dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(), we need to make sure that the
> > opp_list isn't getting accessed simultaneously from other parts of the
> > OPP core while the helper is freeing dynamic OPPs, i.e. we can't drop
> > the opp_table->lock while traversing through the OPP list. And to
> > accomplish that, this patch also creates _opp_kref_release_unlocked()
> > which can be called from this new helper with the opp_table lock already
> > held.
> >
> 
> I did test it but since I couldn't reproduce the original issue, my
> tested-by is not that worth. Anyways the changes look fine to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Applied and pushed to Linus, thanks!


      reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a2a42913-04e0-e6fc-d9ee-a2e355ac22c9@arm.com>
2019-01-04  9:44 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs Viresh Kumar
2019-01-04 10:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-04 10:16     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-04 10:40   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-01-04 11:01   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-11 10:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13587320.TAQQ9Zc4eI@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=Douglas.Raillard@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox