From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.denx.de (mx.denx.de [89.58.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1AF928000C for ; Mon, 19 May 2025 13:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747662391; cv=none; b=b8y7WuW2U3Y8VVB//T1wWXqglA+6SeCWqgQ+fLtMEp09a73xcbHUk57jpQYSAuJxJ+y7s3G9GN8UpIyYguTrsPB4WpGbgYWNOQjzPk6SodW05d2q+4rqHmUkgFmEsv7jsqHJVVrglPsLm4IlR2CaYH4/ps2Vh45Cv6kZJSesvS4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747662391; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4JHlbJffv+4mNNCLT/9/i5HIt+X1wJcN8eLmEPy9Gks=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:References:Date:Cc:To:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Subject; b=auj7TlnpqJ0TFx2YvFE6PNny/gShvkkKDmZQBnmUQ6Pq2VupBEXht3urB20NE5zhEY2FtgA49Yv6nGPQTWwUtDcNN60E32HAqpf7cuFJ0K3FYEhJ33RTZLX1yrrMxOlhLsg6AV9nHNXPNv+SZczHLIDLFcQcdZ88G3HhXh11uyY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b=WLR4iUFW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b="WLR4iUFW" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPA id E484C1039728C; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:38:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=mx-20241105; t=1747661904; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=N1/hqvFMciSOi5HeuuAMzlViYvSbLPpgL4twkOL0a78=; b=WLR4iUFWsTi766GhQbhQhzgpwoTr3SxUab5Ow2+9dP6uGLIz4weFFu/FrMsSUdR6YLraDv 9KkMLWR+Oly+3Xe1tnZvvDAgtUJCh+bUVGoTowg3fLQVMvnU40rY+++cPYHhnCy9gJBqbZ 52juUvSRC0wwNsdFkgYUNJW3qNoj0lEFgBnt77aPEY5PKZEK3UBcnwr+Iof1cVI649mt7j mgFQzteQxVLK/s07+4NdvQrGLithRF5SrrgZ90o5tywAkNfnQu4wT5/9InxUDdGCltKUmJ J85IGhZCvoJlhaFBPeD0buTmtZrGHFK+DDHtijQlwyf2mwHYShLSzM7yeRJomA== From: "Fabio Estevam" In-Reply-To: <2025051936-qualify-waged-4677@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" References: <2025051936-qualify-waged-4677@gregkh> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 15:38:23 +0200 Cc: javierm@redhat.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, stable@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <136-682b3480-1-3097af80@2841359> Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?==?utf-8?q?_FAILED=3A?= patch =?utf-8?q?=22[PATCH]?= =?utf-8?q?_drm/tiny=3A?==?utf-8?q?_panel-mipi-dbi=3A?= Use =?utf-8?q?drm=5Fclient=5Fsetup=5Fwith=5Ffourcc()=22?= failed to apply to =?utf-8?q?6=2E12-stable?= tree User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: None Hi Greg and Thomas, On Monday, May 19, 2025 09:00 -03, wrote: >=20 > The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git comm= it > id to . >=20 > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following com= mands: >=20 > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linu= x.git/ linux-6.12.y > git checkout FETCH=5FHEAD > git cherry-pick -x 9c1798259b9420f38f1fa1b83e3d864c3eb1a83e > # > git commit -s > git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2025051= 936-qualify-waged-4677@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Locally, I am running 6.12 with these two extra dependencies applied: commit 8998eedda2539d2528cfebdc7c17eed0ad35b714 Author: Thomas Zimmermann Date: Tue Sep 24 09:12:03 2024 +0200 drm/fbdev-dma: Support struct drm=5Fdriver.fbdev=5Fprobe =20 Rework fbdev probing to support fbdev=5Fprobe in struct drm=5Fdrive= r and reimplement the old fb=5Fprobe callback on top of it. Provide a= n initializer macro for struct drm=5Fdriver that sets the callback according to the kernel configuration. =20 This change allows the common fbdev client to run on top of DMA- based DRM drivers. =20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240924071734.= 98201-6-tzimmermann@suse.de commit 1b0caa5f5ac20bcaf82fc89a5c849b21ce3bfdf6 Author: Thomas Zimmermann Date: Tue Sep 24 09:12:29 2024 +0200 drm/panel-mipi-dbi: Run DRM default client setup =20 Call drm=5Fclient=5Fsetup() to run the kernel's default client setu= p for DRM. Set fbdev=5Fprobe in struct drm=5Fdriver, so that the clie= nt setup can start the common fbdev client. =20 v5: - select DRM=5FCLIENT=5FSELECTION =20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: "Noralf Tr=C3=B8nnes" Acked-by: Noralf Tr=C3=B8nnes Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240924071734.= 98201-32-tzimmermann@suse.de I have only tested panel-mipi-dbi (the only display available on the bo= ard I use). I am unsure if applying these extra patches to linux-6.12 s= table is safe or if they could cause issues with other fbdev drivers. Regards, Fabio Estevam