From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1374015299.6458.76.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review) From: Steven Rostedt To: Sarah Sharp Cc: Theodore Ts'o , David Lang , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , Olivier Galibert , stable , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Willy Tarreau Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:54:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> References: <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> <1373926109.17876.221.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130715223615.GI15531@xanatos> <20130716211235.GG4994@xanatos> <20130716212704.GB9371@thunk.org> <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 15:43 -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > Yes, that's true. Some kernel developers are better at moderating their > comments and tone towards individuals who are "sensitive". Others > simply don't give a shit. So we need to figure out how to meet > somewhere in the middle, in order to establish a baseline of civility. I have to ask this because I'm thick, and don't really understand, but ... What problem exactly are we trying to solve here? -- Steve