From: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nate Eldredge <nate@thatsmathematics.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Maarten Baert <maarten-baert@hotmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:03:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391493806.3692.11.camel@europa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyrUTshLPk=21H+6ySOeEVS_zVUAK=2QPrq0aqdQ=3_zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:20 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Thinking about it some more, this patch is *almost* not needed at all.
>
> I'm wondering if you should just change the first patch to just always
> initialize the fpu when it is allocated, and at execve() time (ie in
> flush_thread()).
>
We already do this for eager-fpu case, in eager_fpu_init() during boot
and in drop_init_fpu() during flush_thread().
> If we do that, then this:
>
> + if (!tsk_used_math(tsk))
> + init_fpu(tsk);
>
> can be dropped entirely from math_state_restore().
yeah, probably for eager-fpu, but:
> And quite frankly,
> at that point, I think all the changes to __kernel_fpu_end() can go
> away, because at that point math_state_restore() really does the right
> thing - all the allocations are gone, and all the async task state
> games are gone, only the "restore state" remains.
>
> Hmm? So the only thing needed would be to add that "init_fpu()" to the
> initial bootmem allocation path and to change flush_thread() (it
> currently does "drop_init_fpu()", let's just make it initialize the
> FPU state using fpu_finit()), and then we could remove the whole
> "used_math" bit entirely, and just say that the FPU is always
> initialized.
>
> What do you guys think?
No. as I mentioned in the changelog, there is one more path which does
drop_fpu() and we still depend on this used_math bit for eager-fpu.
in signal restore path for 32-bit app, where we copy the sig-context
state from the user stack to the kernel manually (because of legacy
reasons where fsave state is followed by fxsave state etc in the 32-bit
signal handler context and we have to go through convert_to_fxsr() etc).
from __restore_xstate_sig() :
/*
* Drop the current fpu which clears used_math(). This ensures
* that any context-switch during the copy of the new state,
* avoids the intermediate state from getting restored/saved.
* Thus avoiding the new restored state from getting corrupted.
* We will be ready to restore/save the state only after
* set_used_math() is again set.
*/
drop_fpu(tsk);
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 22:01 [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag Nate Eldredge
2014-01-30 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-31 7:33 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-01 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 19:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 20:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 21:17 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-01 21:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 23:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:19 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-02 1:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 8:45 ` Pekka Riikonen
2014-02-02 1:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:47 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 2:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 7:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-03 6:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-03 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-04 6:03 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2014-02-06 5:26 ` Nate Eldredge
2014-02-06 5:34 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-13 15:45 ` Maarten Baert
2014-02-13 20:00 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-27 23:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-07 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-08 6:18 ` Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391493806.3692.11.camel@europa \
--to=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=maarten-baert@hotmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nate@thatsmathematics.com \
--cc=priikone@iki.fi \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox