From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <1411123647.28850.138.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Fix possible deadlock in erase_worker()
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:47:27 +0300
In-Reply-To: <541BFB6D.3040903@nod.at>
References: <1410853702-11616-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
	 <1410946526.28850.120.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <541BFB6D.3040903@nod.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 11:46 +0200, Richard Weinberg
> Or we apply "[PATCH 1/2] UBI: Call worker functions without work_sem held". :)

But I explained in the other e-mail that the semaphore is needed, and
why.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy