From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: move advertising of KVM_CAP_IRQFD to common code
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:54:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425552886-1848-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
POWER supports irqfds but forgot to advertise them. Some userspace does
not check for the capability, but others check it---thus they work on
x86 and s390 but not POWER.
To avoid that other architectures in the future make the same mistake, let
common code handle KVM_CAP_IRQFD the same way as KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE.
Reported-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 297e21053a52f060944e9f0de4c64fad9bcd72fc
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
Marcelo, please apply this for 4.0.
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 0c3623927563..17277968e50a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_ONE_REG:
case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP:
case KVM_CAP_S390_CSS_SUPPORT:
- case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bd7a70be41b3..32bf19ef3115 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2744,7 +2744,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_USER_NMI:
case KVM_CAP_REINJECT_CONTROL:
case KVM_CAP_IRQ_INJECT_STATUS:
- case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD_NO_LENGTH:
case KVM_CAP_PIT2:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index a1093700f3a4..a2214d9609bd 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2492,6 +2492,7 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
case KVM_CAP_SIGNAL_MSI:
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
+ case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
#endif
case KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM:
--
2.3.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 10:54 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-03-05 11:06 ` [PATCH] kvm: move advertising of KVM_CAP_IRQFD to common code Greg Kurz
2015-03-11 0:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425552886-1848-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox