From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sebastian.poehn@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:11:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430302264134193@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ip_forward-drop-frames-with-attached-skb-sk.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Wed Apr 29 12:00:35 CEST 2015
From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20P=C3=B6hn?= <sebastian.poehn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:19:20 +0200
Subject: ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk
From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20P=C3=B6hn?= <sebastian.poehn@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 2ab957492d13bb819400ac29ae55911d50a82a13 ]
Initial discussion was:
[FYI] xfrm: Don't lookup sk_policy for timewait sockets
Forwarded frames should not have a socket attached. Especially
tw sockets will lead to panics later-on in the stack.
This was observed with TPROXY assigning a tw socket and broken
policy routing (misconfigured). As a result frame enters
forwarding path instead of input. We cannot solve this in
TPROXY as it cannot know that policy routing is broken.
v2:
Remove useless comment
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Poehn <sebastian.poehn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/ip_forward.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
@@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ int ip_forward(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct rtable *rt; /* Route we use */
struct ip_options *opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
+ if (unlikely(skb->sk))
+ goto drop;
+
if (skb_warn_if_lro(skb))
goto drop;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from sebastian.poehn@gmail.com are
queue-3.14/ip_forward-drop-frames-with-attached-skb-sk.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430302264134193@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=sebastian.poehn@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).