From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tahsin@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/spinlocks: Fix regression in spinlock contention detection" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:56:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143165136018036@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/spinlocks: Fix regression in spinlock contention detection
to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-spinlocks-fix-regression-in-spinlock-contention-detection.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From e8a4a2696fecb398b0288c43c0e0dbb91e265bb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 21:15:31 -0700
Subject: x86/spinlocks: Fix regression in spinlock contention detection
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
commit e8a4a2696fecb398b0288c43c0e0dbb91e265bb2 upstream.
A spinlock is regarded as contended when there is at least one waiter.
Currently, the code that checks whether there are any waiters rely on
tail value being greater than head. However, this is not true if tail
reaches the max value and wraps back to zero, so arch_spin_is_contended()
incorrectly returns 0 (not contended) when tail is smaller than head.
The original code (before regression) handled this case by casting the
(tail - head) to an unsigned value. This change simply restores that
behavior.
Fixes: d6abfdb20223 ("x86/spinlocks/paravirt: Fix memory corruption on unlock")
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430799331-20445-1-git-send-email-tahsin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline int arch_spin_is_contended
struct __raw_tickets tmp = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
tmp.head &= ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;
- return (tmp.tail - tmp.head) > TICKET_LOCK_INC;
+ return (__ticket_t)(tmp.tail - tmp.head) > TICKET_LOCK_INC;
}
#define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tahsin@google.com are
queue-4.0/x86-spinlocks-fix-regression-in-spinlock-contention-detection.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143165136018036@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tahsin@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox