From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "nilfs2: fix sanity check of btree level in nilfs_btree_root_broken()" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:57:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431655056776@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
nilfs2: fix sanity check of btree level in nilfs_btree_root_broken()
to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nilfs2-fix-sanity-check-of-btree-level-in-nilfs_btree_root_broken.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From d8fd150fe3935e1692bf57c66691e17409ebb9c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:24:00 -0700
Subject: nilfs2: fix sanity check of btree level in nilfs_btree_root_broken()
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
commit d8fd150fe3935e1692bf57c66691e17409ebb9c1 upstream.
The range check for b-tree level parameter in nilfs_btree_root_broken()
is wrong; it accepts the case of "level == NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX" even
though the level is limited to values in the range of 0 to
(NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX - 1).
Since the level parameter is read from storage device and used to index
nilfs_btree_path array whose element count is NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX, it
can cause memory overrun during btree operations if the boundary value
is set to the level parameter on device.
This fixes the broken sanity check and adds a comment to clarify that
the upper bound NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX is exclusive.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/btree.c | 2 +-
include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int nilfs_btree_root_broken(const
nchildren = nilfs_btree_node_get_nchildren(node);
if (unlikely(level < NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_NODE_MIN ||
- level > NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX ||
+ level >= NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX ||
nchildren < 0 ||
nchildren > NILFS_BTREE_ROOT_NCHILDREN_MAX)) {
pr_crit("NILFS: bad btree root (inode number=%lu): level = %d, flags = 0x%x, nchildren = %d\n",
--- a/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ struct nilfs_btree_node {
/* level */
#define NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_DATA 0
#define NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_NODE_MIN (NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_DATA + 1)
-#define NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX 14
+#define NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX 14 /* Max level (exclusive) */
/**
* struct nilfs_palloc_group_desc - block group descriptor
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp are
queue-4.0/nilfs2-fix-sanity-check-of-btree-level-in-nilfs_btree_root_broken.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431655056776@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox