public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tj@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jack@suse.cz
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "writeback: use |1 instead of +1 to protect against div by zero" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:04:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143165547724081@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    writeback: use |1 instead of +1 to protect against div by zero

to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     writeback-use-1-instead-of-1-to-protect-against-div-by-zero.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 464d1387acb94dc43ba772b35242345e3d2ead1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:49:13 -0400
Subject: writeback: use |1 instead of +1 to protect against div by zero

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

commit 464d1387acb94dc43ba772b35242345e3d2ead1b upstream.

mm/page-writeback.c has several places where 1 is added to the divisor
to prevent division by zero exceptions; however, if the original
divisor is equivalent to -1, adding 1 leads to division by zero.

There are three places where +1 is used for this purpose - one in
pos_ratio_polynom() and two in bdi_position_ratio().  The second one
in bdi_position_ratio() actually triggered div-by-zero oops on a
machine running a 3.10 kernel.  The divisor is

  x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1 == span + 1

span is confirmed to be (u32)-1.  It isn't clear how it ended up that
but it could be from write bandwidth calculation underflow fixed by
c72efb658f7c ("writeback: fix possible underflow in write bandwidth
calculation").

At any rate, +1 isn't a proper protection against div-by-zero.  This
patch converts all +1 protections to |1.  Note that
bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit() was already using |1 before this patch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/page-writeback.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsig
 	long x;
 
 	x = div64_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
-		    limit - setpoint + 1);
+		      (limit - setpoint) | 1);
 	pos_ratio = x;
 	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
 	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(
 	 * scale global setpoint to bdi's:
 	 *	bdi_setpoint = setpoint * bdi_thresh / thresh
 	 */
-	x = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh << 16, thresh + 1);
+	x = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh << 16, thresh | 1);
 	bdi_setpoint = setpoint * (u64)x >> 16;
 	/*
 	 * Use span=(8*write_bw) in single bdi case as indicated by
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(
 
 	if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
 		pos_ratio = div64_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
-				    x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
+				      (x_intercept - bdi_setpoint) | 1);
 	} else
 		pos_ratio /= 4;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tj@kernel.org are

queue-4.0/writeback-use-1-instead-of-1-to-protect-against-div-by-zero.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143165547724081@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox