From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
brgerst@gmail.com, dvlasenk@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, luto@amacapital.net,
mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:24:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143529265137222@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
perf-fix-ring_buffer_attach-rcu-sync-again.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 2f993cf093643b98477c421fa2b9a98dcc940323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 22:04:25 +0200
Subject: perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
commit 2f993cf093643b98477c421fa2b9a98dcc940323 upstream.
While looking for other users of get_state/cond_sync. I Found
ring_buffer_attach() and it looks obviously buggy?
Don't we need to ensure that we have "synchronize" _between_
list_del() and list_add() ?
IOW. Suppose that ring_buffer_attach() preempts right_after
get_state_synchronize_rcu() and gp completes before spin_lock().
In this case cond_synchronize_rcu() does nothing and we reuse
->rb_entry without waiting for gp in between?
It also moves the ->rcu_pending check under "if (rb)", to make it
more readable imo.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: der.herr@hofr.at
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Fixes: b69cf53640da ("perf: Fix a race between ring_buffer_detach() and ring_buffer_attach()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150530200425.GA15748@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4331,20 +4331,20 @@ static void ring_buffer_attach(struct pe
WARN_ON_ONCE(event->rcu_pending);
old_rb = event->rb;
- event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
- event->rcu_pending = 1;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
list_del_rcu(&event->rb_entry);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
- }
- if (event->rcu_pending && rb) {
- cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
- event->rcu_pending = 0;
+ event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+ event->rcu_pending = 1;
}
if (rb) {
+ if (event->rcu_pending) {
+ cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
+ event->rcu_pending = 0;
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
list_add_rcu(&event->rb_entry, &rb->event_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from oleg@redhat.com are
queue-4.1/perf-x86-add-more-broadwell-model-numbers.patch
queue-4.1/perf-x86-intel-bts-fix-ds-area-sharing-with-x86_pmu-events.patch
queue-4.1/perf-fix-ring_buffer_attach-rcu-sync-again.patch
queue-4.1/perf-x86-honor-the-architectural-performance-monitoring-version.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-06-26 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143529265137222@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).