From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jann@thejh.net, ciwillia@brocade.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jslaby@suse.cz, shengyong1@huawei.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fs: take i_mutex during prepare_binprm for set[ug]id executables" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:29:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435624177120107@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fs: take i_mutex during prepare_binprm for set[ug]id executables
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fs-take-i_mutex-during-prepare_binprm-for-setid-executables.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 5176b77f1aacdc560eaeac4685ade444bb814689 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:48:39 +0200
Subject: fs: take i_mutex during prepare_binprm for set[ug]id executables
From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
commit 8b01fc86b9f425899f8a3a8fc1c47d73c2c20543 upstream.
This prevents a race between chown() and execve(), where chowning a
setuid-user binary to root would momentarily make the binary setuid
root.
This patch was mostly written by Linus Torvalds.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Charles Williams <ciwillia@brocade.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1265,6 +1265,53 @@ static int check_unsafe_exec(struct linu
return res;
}
+static void bprm_fill_uid(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+ struct inode *inode;
+ unsigned int mode;
+ kuid_t uid;
+ kgid_t gid;
+
+ /* clear any previous set[ug]id data from a previous binary */
+ bprm->cred->euid = current_euid();
+ bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
+
+ if (bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID)
+ return;
+
+ if (current->no_new_privs)
+ return;
+
+ inode = file_inode(bprm->file);
+ mode = ACCESS_ONCE(inode->i_mode);
+ if (!(mode & (S_ISUID|S_ISGID)))
+ return;
+
+ /* Be careful if suid/sgid is set */
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+
+ /* reload atomically mode/uid/gid now that lock held */
+ mode = inode->i_mode;
+ uid = inode->i_uid;
+ gid = inode->i_gid;
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+
+ /* We ignore suid/sgid if there are no mappings for them in the ns */
+ if (!kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, uid) ||
+ !kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, gid))
+ return;
+
+ if (mode & S_ISUID) {
+ bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
+ bprm->cred->euid = uid;
+ }
+
+ if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) {
+ bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
+ bprm->cred->egid = gid;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Fill the binprm structure from the inode.
* Check permissions, then read the first 128 (BINPRM_BUF_SIZE) bytes
@@ -1273,39 +1320,12 @@ static int check_unsafe_exec(struct linu
*/
int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- umode_t mode;
- struct inode * inode = file_inode(bprm->file);
int retval;
- mode = inode->i_mode;
if (bprm->file->f_op == NULL)
return -EACCES;
- /* clear any previous set[ug]id data from a previous binary */
- bprm->cred->euid = current_euid();
- bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
-
- if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) &&
- !current->no_new_privs &&
- kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid) &&
- kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) {
- /* Set-uid? */
- if (mode & S_ISUID) {
- bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
- bprm->cred->euid = inode->i_uid;
- }
-
- /* Set-gid? */
- /*
- * If setgid is set but no group execute bit then this
- * is a candidate for mandatory locking, not a setgid
- * executable.
- */
- if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) {
- bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
- bprm->cred->egid = inode->i_gid;
- }
- }
+ bprm_fill_uid(bprm);
/* fill in binprm security blob */
retval = security_bprm_set_creds(bprm);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jann@thejh.net are
queue-3.10/fs-take-i_mutex-during-prepare_binprm-for-setid-executables.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435624177120107@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ciwillia@brocade.com \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).