stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Patch "sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
@ 2015-06-30  0:29 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2015-06-30  0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jim.m.snow, gregkh, jim.snow, jslaby, lukasz.anaczkowski, mchehab,
	vlee
  Cc: stable, stable-commits


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sb_edac-fix-erroneous-bytes-gigabytes-conversion.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 0fd2dc596b4cbfe1cafc157c2b4ea30dbb95bece Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Snow <jim.m.snow@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:51:09 +0100
Subject: sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion

From: Jim Snow <jim.m.snow@intel.com>

commit 8c009100295597f23978c224aec5751a365bc965 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Jim Snow <jim.snow@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	u32 reg;
 	u64 limit, prv = 0;
 	u64 tmp_mb;
-	u32 mb, kb;
+	u32 gb, mb;
 	u32 rir_way;
 
 	/*
@@ -636,8 +636,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	pvt->tolm = GET_TOLM(reg);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tolm) >> 20;
 
-	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
-	edac_dbg(0, "TOLM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n", mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tolm);
+	gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
+	edac_dbg(0, "TOLM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
+		gb, (mb*1000)/1024, (u64)pvt->tolm);
 
 	/* Address range is already 45:25 */
 	pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_sad1, TOHM,
@@ -645,8 +646,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	pvt->tohm = GET_TOHM(reg);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tohm) >> 20;
 
-	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
-	edac_dbg(0, "TOHM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n", mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tohm);
+	gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
+	edac_dbg(0, "TOHM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
+		gb, (mb*1000)/1024, (u64)pvt->tohm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Step 2) Get SAD range and SAD Interleave list
@@ -668,11 +670,11 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 			break;
 
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
-		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "SAD#%d %s up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx) Interleave: %s reg=0x%08x\n",
 			 n_sads,
 			 get_dram_attr(reg),
-			 mb, kb,
+			 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			 INTERLEAVE_MODE(reg) ? "8:6" : "[8:6]XOR[18:16]",
 			 reg);
@@ -702,9 +704,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 			break;
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
 
-		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "TAD#%d: up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), socket interleave %d, memory interleave %d, TGT: %d, %d, %d, %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
-			 n_tads, mb, kb,
+			 n_tads, gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			 (u32)TAD_SOCK(reg),
 			 (u32)TAD_CH(reg),
@@ -727,10 +729,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 					      tad_ch_nilv_offset[j],
 					      &reg);
 			tmp_mb = TAD_OFFSET(reg) >> 20;
-			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 			edac_dbg(0, "TAD CH#%d, offset #%d: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), reg=0x%08x\n",
 				 i, j,
-				 mb, kb,
+				 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 				 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				 reg);
 		}
@@ -752,10 +754,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 
 			tmp_mb = RIR_LIMIT(reg) >> 20;
 			rir_way = 1 << RIR_WAY(reg);
-			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 			edac_dbg(0, "CH#%d RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 				 i, j,
-				 mb, kb,
+				 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 				 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				 rir_way,
 				 reg);
@@ -766,10 +768,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 						      &reg);
 				tmp_mb = RIR_OFFSET(reg) << 6;
 
-				mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+				gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 				edac_dbg(0, "CH#%d RIR#%d INTL#%d, offset %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), tgt: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 					 i, j, k,
-					 mb, kb,
+					 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 					 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 					 (u32)RIR_RNK_TGT(reg),
 					 reg);
@@ -806,7 +808,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 	u8			ch_way,sck_way;
 	u32			tad_offset;
 	u32			rir_way;
-	u32			mb, kb;
+	u32			mb, gb;
 	u64			ch_addr, offset, limit, prv = 0;
 
 
@@ -1022,10 +1024,10 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 			continue;
 
 		limit = RIR_LIMIT(reg);
-		mb = div_u64_rem(limit >> 20, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(limit >> 20, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d\n",
 			 n_rir,
-			 mb, kb,
+			 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 limit,
 			 1 << RIR_WAY(reg));
 		if  (ch_addr <= limit)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jim.m.snow@intel.com are

queue-3.10/sb_edac-fix-erroneous-bytes-gigabytes-conversion.patch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-06-30  0:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-30  0:29 Patch "sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree gregkh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).