From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion where necessary" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:42:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143710093610291@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion where necessary
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pci-pciehp-wait-for-hotplug-command-completion-where-necessary.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a5dd4b4b0570b3bf880d563969b245dfbd170c1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:10:50 -0600
Subject: PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion where necessary
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
commit a5dd4b4b0570b3bf880d563969b245dfbd170c1e upstream.
The commit referenced below deferred waiting for command completion until
the start of the next command, allowing hardware to do the latching
asynchronously. Unfortunately, being ready to accept a new command is the
only indication we have that the previous command is completed. In cases
where we need that state change to be enabled, we must still wait for
completion. For instance, pciehp_reset_slot() attempts to disable anything
that might generate a surprise hotplug on slots that support presence
detection. If we don't wait for those settings to latch before the
secondary bus reset, we negate any value in attempting to prevent the
spurious hotplug.
Create a base function with optional wait and helper functions so that
pcie_write_cmd() turns back into the "safe" interface which waits before
and after issuing a command and add pcie_write_cmd_nowait(), which
eliminates the trailing wait for asynchronous completion. The following
functions are returned to their previous behavior:
pciehp_power_on_slot
pciehp_power_off_slot
pcie_disable_notification
pciehp_reset_slot
The rationale is that pciehp_power_on_slot() enables the link and therefore
relies on completion of power-on. pciehp_power_off_slot() and
pcie_disable_notification() need a wait because data structures may be
freed after these calls and continued signaling from the device would be
unexpected. And, of course, pciehp_reset_slot() needs to wait for the
scenario outlined above.
Fixes: 3461a068661c ("PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion lazily")
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -176,20 +176,17 @@ static void pcie_wait_cmd(struct control
jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - ctrl->cmd_started));
}
-/**
- * pcie_write_cmd - Issue controller command
- * @ctrl: controller to which the command is issued
- * @cmd: command value written to slot control register
- * @mask: bitmask of slot control register to be modified
- */
-static void pcie_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd, u16 mask)
+static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
+ u16 mask, bool wait)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
u16 slot_ctrl;
mutex_lock(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
- /* Wait for any previous command that might still be in progress */
+ /*
+ * Always wait for any previous command that might still be in progress
+ */
pcie_wait_cmd(ctrl);
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
@@ -201,9 +198,33 @@ static void pcie_write_cmd(struct contro
ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies;
ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
+ /*
+ * Optionally wait for the hardware to be ready for a new command,
+ * indicating completion of the above issued command.
+ */
+ if (wait)
+ pcie_wait_cmd(ctrl);
+
mutex_unlock(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
}
+/**
+ * pcie_write_cmd - Issue controller command
+ * @ctrl: controller to which the command is issued
+ * @cmd: command value written to slot control register
+ * @mask: bitmask of slot control register to be modified
+ */
+static void pcie_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd, u16 mask)
+{
+ pcie_do_write_cmd(ctrl, cmd, mask, true);
+}
+
+/* Same as above without waiting for the hardware to latch */
+static void pcie_write_cmd_nowait(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd, u16 mask)
+{
+ pcie_do_write_cmd(ctrl, cmd, mask, false);
+}
+
bool pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
@@ -422,7 +443,7 @@ void pciehp_set_attention_status(struct
default:
return;
}
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, slot_cmd, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, slot_cmd, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, slot_cmd);
}
@@ -434,7 +455,8 @@ void pciehp_green_led_on(struct slot *sl
if (!PWR_LED(ctrl))
return;
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_ON, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_ON,
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_ON);
@@ -447,7 +469,8 @@ void pciehp_green_led_off(struct slot *s
if (!PWR_LED(ctrl))
return;
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_OFF, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_OFF,
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_OFF);
@@ -460,7 +483,8 @@ void pciehp_green_led_blink(struct slot
if (!PWR_LED(ctrl))
return;
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_BLINK, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_BLINK,
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_IND_BLINK);
@@ -613,7 +637,7 @@ void pcie_enable_notification(struct con
PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE |
PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_DLLSCE);
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, cmd, mask);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, cmd, mask);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, cmd);
}
@@ -664,7 +688,7 @@ int pciehp_reset_slot(struct slot *slot,
pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(ctrl->pcie->port);
pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, stat_mask);
- pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, ctrl_mask, ctrl_mask);
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, ctrl_mask, ctrl_mask);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, ctrl_mask);
if (pciehp_poll_mode)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from alex.williamson@redhat.com are
queue-4.1/pci-pciehp-wait-for-hotplug-command-completion-where-necessary.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143710093610291@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).