From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: buytenh@wantstofly.org, alex.aring@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, marcel@holtmann.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ieee802154: Fix sockaddr_ieee802154 implicit padding information leak." has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:25:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438215946207182@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ieee802154: Fix sockaddr_ieee802154 implicit padding information leak.
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ieee802154-fix-sockaddr_ieee802154-implicit-padding-information-leak.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 8a70cefa3037d62e7c0b6068a66675def1a330c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 10:50:19 +0300
Subject: ieee802154: Fix sockaddr_ieee802154 implicit padding information leak.
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
commit 8a70cefa3037d62e7c0b6068a66675def1a330c9 upstream.
The AF_IEEE802154 sockaddr looks like this:
struct sockaddr_ieee802154 {
sa_family_t family; /* AF_IEEE802154 */
struct ieee802154_addr_sa addr;
};
struct ieee802154_addr_sa {
int addr_type;
u16 pan_id;
union {
u8 hwaddr[IEEE802154_ADDR_LEN];
u16 short_addr;
};
};
On most architectures there will be implicit structure padding here,
in two different places:
* In struct sockaddr_ieee802154, two bytes of padding between 'family'
(unsigned short) and 'addr', so that 'addr' starts on a four byte
boundary.
* In struct ieee802154_addr_sa, two bytes at the end of the structure,
to make the structure 16 bytes.
When calling recvmsg(2) on a PF_IEEE802154 SOCK_DGRAM socket, the
ieee802154 stack constructs a struct sockaddr_ieee802154 on the
kernel stack without clearing these padding fields, and, depending
on the addr_type, between four and ten bytes of uncleared kernel
stack will be copied to userspace.
We can't just insert two 'u16 __pad's in the right places and zero
those before copying an address to userspace, as not all architectures
insert this implicit padding -- from a quick test it seems that avr32,
cris and m68k don't insert this padding, while every other architecture
that I have cross compilers for does insert this padding.
The easiest way to plug the leak is to just memset the whole struct
sockaddr_ieee802154 before filling in the fields we want to fill in,
and that's what this patch does.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Acked-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ieee802154/socket.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ieee802154/socket.c
+++ b/net/ieee802154/socket.c
@@ -739,6 +739,12 @@ static int dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk
sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
if (saddr) {
+ /* Clear the implicit padding in struct sockaddr_ieee802154
+ * (16 bits between 'family' and 'addr') and in struct
+ * ieee802154_addr_sa (16 bits at the end of the structure).
+ */
+ memset(saddr, 0, sizeof(*saddr));
+
saddr->family = AF_IEEE802154;
ieee802154_addr_to_sa(&saddr->addr, &mac_cb(skb)->source);
*addr_len = sizeof(*saddr);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from buytenh@wantstofly.org are
queue-4.1/ieee802154-fix-sockaddr_ieee802154-implicit-padding-information-leak.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438215946207182@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).