From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: david@hardeman.nu, david.cimburek@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mchehab@osg.samsung.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:25:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438215955178102@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
rc-core-fix-dib0700-scancode-generation-for-rc5.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david@hardeman.nu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:01 -0300
Subject: [media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david@hardeman.nu>
commit 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 upstream.
commit af3a4a9bbeb0 ("[media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup") cleaned
up the NEC scancode logic but overlooked the RC5 case.
This patch brings the RC5 case in line with the NEC code and makes
the struct self-documenting.
Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
Reported-by: David Cimbůrek <david.cimburek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
@@ -655,10 +655,20 @@ out:
struct dib0700_rc_response {
u8 report_id;
u8 data_state;
- u8 system;
- u8 not_system;
- u8 data;
- u8 not_data;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ u8 system;
+ u8 not_system;
+ u8 data;
+ u8 not_data;
+ } nec;
+ struct {
+ u8 not_used;
+ u8 system;
+ u8 data;
+ u8 not_data;
+ } rc5;
+ };
};
#define RC_MSG_SIZE_V1_20 6
@@ -694,8 +704,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
deb_data("IR ID = %02X state = %02X System = %02X %02X Cmd = %02X %02X (len %d)\n",
poll_reply->report_id, poll_reply->data_state,
- poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data,
+ poll_reply->nec.system, poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data, poll_reply->nec.not_data,
purb->actual_length);
switch (d->props.rc.core.protocol) {
@@ -704,30 +714,30 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
toggle = 0;
/* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */
- if (poll_reply->system == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->data == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->not_data == 0xff) {
+ if (poll_reply->nec.system == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.data == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.not_data == 0xff) {
poll_reply->data_state = 2;
break;
}
- if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
+ if ((poll_reply->nec.data ^ poll_reply->nec.not_data) != 0xff) {
deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system << 24 |
- poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
- poll_reply->data << 8 |
- poll_reply->not_data);
- } else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) {
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->nec.system << 24 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system << 16 |
+ poll_reply->nec.data << 8 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_data);
+ } else if ((poll_reply->nec.system ^ poll_reply->nec.not_system) != 0xff) {
deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 |
- poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->nec.system << 8 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data);
} else {
deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system,
- poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->nec.system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data);
}
break;
@@ -735,17 +745,17 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
deb_data("RC5 protocol\n");
protocol = RC_TYPE_RC5;
toggle = poll_reply->report_id;
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->system, poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->rc5.system, poll_reply->rc5.data);
- break;
- }
+ if ((poll_reply->rc5.data ^ poll_reply->rc5.not_data) != 0xff) {
+ /* Key failed integrity check */
+ err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
+ poll_reply->rc5.not_used, poll_reply->rc5.system,
+ poll_reply->rc5.data, poll_reply->rc5.not_data);
+ goto resubmit;
+ }
- if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
- /* Key failed integrity check */
- err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
- poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data);
- goto resubmit;
+ break;
}
rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, protocol, keycode, toggle);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david@hardeman.nu are
queue-4.1/rc-core-fix-dib0700-scancode-generation-for-rc5.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438215955178102@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david.cimburek@gmail.com \
--cc=david@hardeman.nu \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).