Patch "[media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree

Patch "[media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    [media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5

to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rc-core-fix-dib0700-scancode-generation-for-rc5.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david@hardeman.nu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:01 -0300
Subject: [media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david@hardeman.nu>

commit 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 upstream.

commit af3a4a9bbeb0 ("[media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup") cleaned
up the NEC scancode logic but overlooked the RC5 case.

This patch brings the RC5 case in line with the NEC code and makes
the struct self-documenting.

Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
Reported-by: David Cimbůrek <david.cimburek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
@@ -655,10 +655,20 @@ out:
 struct dib0700_rc_response {
 	u8 report_id;
 	u8 data_state;
-	u8 system;
-	u8 not_system;
-	u8 data;
-	u8 not_data;
+	union {
+		struct {
+			u8 system;
+			u8 not_system;
+			u8 data;
+			u8 not_data;
+		} nec;
+		struct {
+			u8 not_used;
+			u8 system;
+			u8 data;
+			u8 not_data;
+		} rc5;
+	};
 };
 #define RC_MSG_SIZE_V1_20 6
 
@@ -694,8 +704,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
 
 	deb_data("IR ID = %02X state = %02X System = %02X %02X Cmd = %02X %02X (len %d)\n",
 		 poll_reply->report_id, poll_reply->data_state,
-		 poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
-		 poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data,
+		 poll_reply->nec.system, poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+		 poll_reply->nec.data, poll_reply->nec.not_data,
 		 purb->actual_length);
 
 	switch (d->props.rc.core.protocol) {
@@ -704,30 +714,30 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
 		toggle = 0;
 
 		/* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */
-		if (poll_reply->system     == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->data       == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->not_data   == 0xff) {
+		if (poll_reply->nec.system     == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.not_system == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.data       == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.not_data   == 0xff) {
 			poll_reply->data_state = 2;
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
+		if ((poll_reply->nec.data ^ poll_reply->nec.not_data) != 0xff) {
 			deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system     << 24 |
-						     poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
-						     poll_reply->data       << 8  |
-						     poll_reply->not_data);
-		} else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) {
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->nec.system     << 24 |
+						     poll_reply->nec.not_system << 16 |
+						     poll_reply->nec.data       << 8  |
+						     poll_reply->nec.not_data);
+		} else if ((poll_reply->nec.system ^ poll_reply->nec.not_system) != 0xff) {
 			deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 |
-						    poll_reply->not_system,
-						    poll_reply->data);
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->nec.system << 8 |
+						    poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+						    poll_reply->nec.data);
 
 		} else {
 			deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system,
-						   poll_reply->data);
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->nec.system,
+						   poll_reply->nec.data);
 		}
 
 		break;
@@ -735,17 +745,17 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(st
 		deb_data("RC5 protocol\n");
 		protocol = RC_TYPE_RC5;
 		toggle = poll_reply->report_id;
-		keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->system, poll_reply->data);
+		keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->rc5.system, poll_reply->rc5.data);
 
-		break;
-	}
+		if ((poll_reply->rc5.data ^ poll_reply->rc5.not_data) != 0xff) {
+			/* Key failed integrity check */
+			err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
+			    poll_reply->rc5.not_used, poll_reply->rc5.system,
+			    poll_reply->rc5.data, poll_reply->rc5.not_data);
+			goto resubmit;
+		}
 
-	if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
-		/* Key failed integrity check */
-		err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
-		    poll_reply->system,  poll_reply->not_system,
-		    poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data);
-		goto resubmit;
+		break;
 	}
 
 	rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, protocol, keycode, toggle);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david@hardeman.nu are

queue-4.1/rc-core-fix-dib0700-scancode-generation-for-rc5.patch