From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dchinner@redhat.com, bfoster@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xfs: remote attributes need to be considered data" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:05:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143907152921110@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfs: remote attributes need to be considered data
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfs-remote-attributes-need-to-be-considered-data.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From df150ed102baa0e78c06e08e975dfb47147dd677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:48:02 +1000
Subject: xfs: remote attributes need to be considered data
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
commit df150ed102baa0e78c06e08e975dfb47147dd677 upstream.
We don't log remote attribute contents, and instead write them
synchronously before we commit the block allocation and attribute
tree update transaction. As a result we are writing to the allocated
space before the allcoation has been made permanent.
As a result, we cannot consider this allocation to be a metadata
allocation. Metadata allocation can take blocks from the free list
and so reuse them before the transaction that freed the block is
committed to disk. This behaviour is perfectly fine for journalled
metadata changes as log recovery will ensure the free operation is
replayed before the overwrite, but for remote attribute writes this
is not the case.
Hence we have to consider the remote attribute blocks to contain
data and allocate accordingly. We do this by dropping the
XFS_BMAPI_METADATA flag from the block allocation. This means the
allocation will not use blocks that are on the busy list without
first ensuring that the freeing transaction has been committed to
disk and the blocks removed from the busy list. This ensures we will
never overwrite a freed block without first ensuring that it is
really free.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
@@ -451,14 +451,21 @@ xfs_attr_rmtval_set(
/*
* Allocate a single extent, up to the size of the value.
+ *
+ * Note that we have to consider this a data allocation as we
+ * write the remote attribute without logging the contents.
+ * Hence we must ensure that we aren't using blocks that are on
+ * the busy list so that we don't overwrite blocks which have
+ * recently been freed but their transactions are not yet
+ * committed to disk. If we overwrite the contents of a busy
+ * extent and then crash then the block may not contain the
+ * correct metadata after log recovery occurs.
*/
xfs_bmap_init(args->flist, args->firstblock);
nmap = 1;
error = xfs_bmapi_write(args->trans, dp, (xfs_fileoff_t)lblkno,
- blkcnt,
- XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK | XFS_BMAPI_METADATA,
- args->firstblock, args->total, &map, &nmap,
- args->flist);
+ blkcnt, XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK, args->firstblock,
+ args->total, &map, &nmap, args->flist);
if (!error) {
error = xfs_bmap_finish(&args->trans, args->flist,
&committed);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dchinner@redhat.com are
queue-4.1/xfs-remote-attributes-need-to-be-considered-data.patch
queue-4.1/xfs-remote-attribute-headers-contain-an-invalid-lsn.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-08-08 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143907152921110@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).