stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xiexiuqi@huawei.com, cminyard@mvista.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hushiyuan@huawei.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:12:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143950036885126@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ipmi-fix-timeout-calculation-when-bmc-is-disconnected.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From e21404dc0ac7ac971c1e36274b48bb460463f4e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:00:52 -0600
Subject: ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected

From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>

commit e21404dc0ac7ac971c1e36274b48bb460463f4e5 upstream.

Loading ipmi_si module while bmc is disconnected, we found the timeout
is longer than 5 secs.  Actually it takes about 3 mins and 20
secs.(HZ=250)

error message as below:
  Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ] 1 retries left
  Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: BT: write 4 bytes seq=0x01 03 18 00 01
  [...]
  Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ]
  Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: failed 2 retries, sending error response
  Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI: BT reset (takes 5 secs)
  Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: flag reset [ ]

Function wait_for_msg_done() use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) to
sleep 1 tick, so we should subtract jiffies_to_usecs(1) instead of 100
usecs from timeout.

Reported-by: Hu Shiyuan <hushiyuan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ static int wait_for_msg_done(struct smi_
 		    smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITH_TICK_DELAY) {
 			schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
 			smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
-				smi_info->si_sm, 100);
+				smi_info->si_sm, jiffies_to_usecs(1));
 		} else if (smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITHOUT_DELAY) {
 			smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
 				smi_info->si_sm, 0);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from xiexiuqi@huawei.com are

queue-3.10/ipmi-fix-timeout-calculation-when-bmc-is-disconnected.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-08-13 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143950036885126@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
    --cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).